Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973727›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Spindle-localized F-actin regulates polar MTOC organization and the fidelity of meiotic spindle formation.

Edgar J Soto-Moreno, Nourhan N Ali, Florian Küllmer, Veselin Nasufovic, Michaela Frolikova, Olga Tepla, Jaromir Masata, Dirk Trauner, Amanda A Patterson, Hans-Dieter Arndt and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular mechanisms of folliculogenesis and oogenesis.Systems biology in reproductive medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. From Cytoskeletal Remodeling to Oocyte Quality: The Emerging Role of Mechanics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Edgar J Soto-MorenoDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Nourhan N AliDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Florian KüllmerFriedrich-Schiller-Universität (FSU), Institut für Organische Chemie und Makromolekulare Chemie, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0671-1546
Veselin NasufovicFriedrich-Schiller-Universität (FSU), Institut für Organische Chemie und Makromolekulare Chemie, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6812-637X
Michaela FrolikovaLaboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-8405
Olga TeplaLaboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
Jaromir MasataDepartment of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dirk TraunerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6782-6056
Amanda A PattersonDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Hans-Dieter ArndtFriedrich-Schiller-Universität (FSU), Institut für Organische Chemie und Makromolekulare Chemie, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0792-1422
Katerina KomrskovaLaboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-2148
Magdalena Zernicka-GoetzDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7004-2471
David M GloverDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0956-0103
Ahmed Z BalboulaDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. abalboula@missouri.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9663-6262

Funding

Mechanisms underpinning meiotic spindle formation and behaviorR35GM142537 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI AHMED BALBOULA · 2021 to 2026
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian oocytes are notoriously prone to chromosome segregation errors leading to aneuploidy. The spindle provides the machinery for accurate chromosome segregation during cell division. Mammalian oocytes lack centrioles and, therefore, mouse meiotic spindle relies on the organization of numerous acentriolar microtubule organizing centers into two poles (polar microtubule organizing centers, pMTOCs). The traditional view is that, in mammalian oocytes, microtubules are the sole cytoskeletal component responsible for regulating pMTOC organization and spindle assembly. We identify a previously unrecognized F-actin pool that surrounds pMTOCs, forming F-actin cage-like structure. We demonstrate that F-actin localization on the spindle depends on unconventional myosins X and VIIb. Selective disruption of spindle-localized F-actin, using myosin X/VIIb knockdown oocytes or photoswitchable Optojasp-1, perturbs pMTOC organization, leading to unfocused spindle poles and chromosome missegregation. Here, we unveil an important function of spindle-localized F-actin in regulating pMTOC organization, a critical process for ensuring the fidelity of meiotic spindle formation and proper chromosome segregation.

Indexed as

ActinsMeiosisMicrotubule-Organizing CenterOocytesSpindle ApparatusAnimalsChromosome SegregationFemaleMiceMicrotubulesMyosinsActinsMyosins

Identifiers

PMID40973727
PMCPMC12449456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.