SynthesisJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
The analgesic effects of human milk odor in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pain Management During Neonatal Blood Sampling: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preterm neonates frequently undergo a variety of painful and invasive procedures. Neonatal pain has been associated with changes in hormone levels, tissue damage, and brain development. Nonpharmacological approaches, such as the use of breast milk odor, have been investigated as a strategy to reduce those effects. However, its efficacy remains unclear, and further research is needed to establish its true therapeutic value. PURPOSE: Evaluate the analgesic effects of breast milk odor in premature neonates.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of human milk odor compared with no aromatherapy (control) or placebo (odorless diffuser/distilled water/saline) on pain relief, oxygen saturation (SaO₂), and heart rate in preterm neonates undergoing invasive procedures. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data up to July 5, 2025. Statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan Web (version 8.0.0) for the primary meta-analyses, and R software was used to perform sensitivity analyses.
resultsAmong 460 references identified, eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, totaling 451 preterm neonates, of whom 225 (49.9%) were exposed to human milk odor. The mean gestational age was 33.56 ± 2.58 weeks, and 226 (50.1%) were male. Two studies were conducted using venipuncture as a painful procedure, four used the heel prick test, one used peripheral catheterization, and one used vaccination. Compared with the control group and the placebo, the group exposed to the milk odor showed a reduction in pain scores during the painful procedure (SMD = -0.95; 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.45; p = 0.0002; I² = 84%). The subgroup analysis of the five RCTs that used the PIPP score for the pain assessment showed similar results; the human milk odor-exposed group showed a lower pain score compared with the control group (MD -2.66; 95% CI -4.25 to -1.06; p = 0.001). Secondary outcomes included physiological parameters such as heart rate and oxygen saturation (SaO₂). Neonates exposed to breast milk odor exhibited lower heart rates compared to control (MD = -9.26; 95% CI: -14.28 to -4.24; p = 0.0003; I² = 27%). Oxygen saturation was also higher in the intervention group (MD = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.68-4.12; p = 0.006; I² = 53%)
conclusionAromatherapy with human breast milk reduces pain in neonates. Larger studies are needed to validate our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40973724What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.