Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973715›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2025

Oestradiol and breast cancer prevention: a 40 year history and contemporary perspective.

Jack Cuzick, Mitch Dowsett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jack CuzickJohn Snow Emeritus Professor of Epidemiology, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. j.cuzick@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7420-7512
Mitch DowsettProfessor Emeritus, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4122-744X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly 40 years ago one of us published a conceptual article arguing the case for studies of breast cancer prevention with tamoxifen. Recent observations on the interaction of plasma oestrogen levels with the preventive effect of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole make it timely to consider the development of oestrogen-targeted prevention of breast cancer and the evidence upon which that development was made. In this article we review the understanding of the aetiology of breast cancer in the mid-1980s; its subsequent development, including the findings from the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer with tamoxifen and from the trials that assessed tamoxifen as a preventive agent in women at increased risk. We then focus on results from the comparative trials of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) versus tamoxifen and the extension of the use of AIs in trials for prevention. We describe the relationship between plasma levels of oestradiol and its major protein binder, sex hormone binding globulin, on the development of oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer and how these impact on the preventive effect of the AI, anastrozole, in postmenopausal women. Lastly, we speculate on the potential role of routine measurement of oestradiol in managing risk and achieving prevention of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstradiolAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHumansNitrilesTamoxifenTriazolesAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsEstradiolNitrilesTamoxifenTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID40973715
PMCPMC12690128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.