ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
KADAIF: an anomaly detection method for complex microbiome data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the cancer microbiome: multi-omics, AI, and translational opportunities.Genome biology · 2026Review
- scDiagnostics: systematic assessment of cell type annotation in single-cell transcriptomics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe gut microbiome plays an important role in human health and disease, prompting large-scale studies that generate extensive datasets. A critical preprocessing step in analysing such datasets is anomaly detection, which aims to identify erroneous samples and prevent misleading statistical outcomes. Microbiome data, however, pose unique challenges such as compositionality, sparsity, interdependencies, and high dimensionality, limiting the effectiveness of conventional methods and highlighting the need for specifically-tailored approaches for anomaly detection in microbiome data. IMPLEMENTATION: To address this challenge, we introduce KADAIF, a microbiome-specific anomaly detection method that generalizes the common Isolation Forest (IF) approach. As in IF, KADAIF builds an ensemble of trees, each recursively partitioning the data along randomly selected features, and measures the average depth at which samples are isolated, assuming that anomalous samples will be isolated closer to the root. Unlike IF, however, KADAIF partitions samples based on subsets of features (coupled with dimensionality reduction), addressing microbiome-specific properties such as sparsity and species interactions.
resultsWe evaluate KADAIF by simulating common scenarios that introduce anomalous behavior, demonstrating that KADAIF outperforms alternative methods across various settings and datasets. Furthermore, we show that KADAIF outperforms IF in detecting anomalies also in other types of high-dimensional sparse biological data. Finally, we show KADAIF's application for identifying disease onset in longitudinal microbiome data and for partitioning cases versus controls based on the Anna Karenina principle. Combined, our work highlights KADAIF's potential to enhance microbiome data processing and downstream analyses, with beneficial implications for precision medicine studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An implementation of KADAIF, as well as all the code used for the analysis, is available on GitHub (https://github.com/borenstein-lab/KADAIF).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.