Observational studyJournal of occupational health2025
Sleep and well-being before and after a shift schedule change in ICU nurses: an observational study using wearable sensors.
Observational study in Journal of occupational health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between workload, compassion fatigue and presenteeism among maternal and newborn health professionals: the moderated role of self-compassion.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Network Analysis of Sleep Quality and Psychiatric Symptoms Among ICU Nursing Staff.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate, using wearable sensors, the impact of transitioning from an 8-hour to a 12-hour shift schedule on sleep patterns and well-being in intensive care unit (ICU) nurses with pre-existing sleep disturbances. We also examined differences in outcome based on chronotype.
methodsWe conducted an observational study at a university hospital ICU between November 2020 and October 2023, before and after a hospital-wide shift schedule change. Nurses wore wearable sensors and completed daily surveys over 5 weeks under each shift system. Rotating-shift ICU nurses with a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score >5 were eligible. Sleep metrics and subjective well-being were compared using linear mixed models, adjusting for age. Sleep episodes were categorized relative to shift timing, and chronotype-stratified subgroup analyses were performed.
resultsEighty nurses completed the study (12-hour shift: 37; 8-hour shift: 43). The interval between shifts was greater for the 12-hour shift group (36.12 vs 26.78 hours). Total sleep duration did not significantly differ between groups (12-hour shift: 418.5 minutes; 8-hour shift: 398 minutes); however, the 12-hour shift group had less fragmented sleep, higher subjective well-being scores, and lower reported stress and fatigue. Evening chronotypes appeared to benefit more from 12-hour shifts, with longer sleep duration and higher well-being scores, though these differences were not statistically significant.
conclusionsTransitioning to a 12-hour shift schedule was associated with reduced sleep fragmentation and improved well-being, particularly among evening chronotypes. These findings suggest that shift schedule structure and individual chronotype may influence adaptation to shift work in ICU settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.