ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Federated learning for the pathogenicity annotation of genetic variants in multi-site clinical settings.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiovascular Genetics: From Multimodal Diagnosis to Risk Prediction and Precision Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Rare Diseases: Workflow-Integrated Precision Kidney Care.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Federated learning frameworks: quality and interoperability for biomedical research.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Rethinking scale in AI-driven genomic medicine - The role of small biobanks.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRare diseases collectively affect 5% of the population. However, fewer than 50% of rare disease patients receive a molecular diagnosis after whole genome sequencing. Supervised machine learning is a valuable approach for the pathogenicity scoring of human genetic variants. However, existing methods are often trained on curated but limited central repositories, resulting in poor accuracy when tested on external cohorts. Yet, large collections of variants generated at hospitals and research institutions remain inaccessible to machine-learning purposes because of privacy and legal constraints. Federated learning (FL) algorithms have been recently developed enabling institutions to collaboratively train models without sharing their local datasets.
resultsHere, we present a proof-of-concept study evaluating the effectiveness of FL for the clinical classification of genetic variants. A comprehensive array of diverse FL strategies was assessed for coding and non-coding Single Nucleotide Variants as well as Copy Number Variants. Our results showed that federated models generally achieved comparable or superior performance to traditional centralized learning. In addition, federated models reached a robust generalization to independent sets with smaller data fractions as compared to their centralized model counterparts. Our findings support the adoption of FL to establish secure multi-institutional collaborations in human variant interpretation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code required to reproduce the results presented in this article, implemented in Python, is available under the GNU General Public License v3 at https://github.com/RausellLab/FedLearnVar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.