ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026
Automated calibration of stomatal conductance models from thermal imagery by leveraging synthetic images generated from Helios 3D biophysical model simulations.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wheat: Integrating Agronomic, Genomics, and Remote Sensing for Sustainable Production.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Review
- Leaf gas exchange measurement for steady-state stomatal conductance model calibration.The New phytologist · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stomatal conductance (gs) is indicative of plant carbon dioxide uptake via photosynthesis and water loss via transpiration, making it a crucial plant biophysical trait. Direct measurement of gs is labor-intensive and usually not scalable to large fields. Using manual measurements to estimate parameters of gs models is even more labor-intensive and prone to sampling errors. This study aimed to develop an automated pipeline for gs measurement and model calibration using thermal imagery data, which not only disentangles the impacts of genotype-specific stomatal traits and environmental conditions but also enables the prediction of gs in new environments. The methodology involved using simulated thermal imagery data generated from a 3D biophysical model to train a machine learning model that could be applied to real thermal images to predict stomatal model parameters and gs itself. The method was evaluated by comparing predictions against manual gs measurements, all of which were not part of the model training process, as the model was trained against only simulated images. When compared against manual gs measurements using a porometer, the prediction R2 was 0.7, which is likely comparable to the accuracy of the manual porometer-based gs measurements (relative to a leaf gas exchange system). The developed pipeline enables high-throughput gs model parameter calibration and gs estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.