Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973639›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026

Automated calibration of stomatal conductance models from thermal imagery by leveraging synthetic images generated from Helios 3D biophysical model simulations.

Ismael K Mayanja, Heesup Yun, Brian N Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ismael K MayanjaDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Heesup YunDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Brian N BaileyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1919-2324

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-002830NIFA 7003146USDA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomatal conductance (gs) is indicative of plant carbon dioxide uptake via photosynthesis and water loss via transpiration, making it a crucial plant biophysical trait. Direct measurement of gs is labor-intensive and usually not scalable to large fields. Using manual measurements to estimate parameters of gs models is even more labor-intensive and prone to sampling errors. This study aimed to develop an automated pipeline for gs measurement and model calibration using thermal imagery data, which not only disentangles the impacts of genotype-specific stomatal traits and environmental conditions but also enables the prediction of gs in new environments. The methodology involved using simulated thermal imagery data generated from a 3D biophysical model to train a machine learning model that could be applied to real thermal images to predict stomatal model parameters and gs itself. The method was evaluated by comparing predictions against manual gs measurements, all of which were not part of the model training process, as the model was trained against only simulated images. When compared against manual gs measurements using a porometer, the prediction R2 was 0.7, which is likely comparable to the accuracy of the manual porometer-based gs measurements (relative to a leaf gas exchange system). The developed pipeline enables high-throughput gs model parameter calibration and gs estimation.

Indexed as

Plant StomataPlant TranspirationCalibrationMachine LearningModels, BiologicalLeaf temperaturemachine learningremote sensingstomatal conductancethermographywater status

Identifiers

PMID40973639
PMCPMC12794223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.