Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973626›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025

Phylogenetic Methods Meet Deep Learning.

Svitlana Braichenko, Rui Borges, Carolin Kosiol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Svitlana BraichenkoInstitute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3330-6631
Rui BorgesSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Mathematical Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5905-3778
Carolin KosiolCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3219-6648

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (FWF) 10.55776/P34524Austrian Science Fund (FWF) 10.55776/P37050Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBW00768/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/Y513842/1Medical Research Council MC_FE_00035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) has been widely used in various scientific fields, but its integration into phylogenetics has been slower, primarily due to the complex nature of phylogenetic data. The studies that apply DL to sequencing data often limit analyses to four-taxon trees. Many of these studies serve as "proof of principle" and perform similarly to traditional phylogeny reconstruction methods. New ways of using training data, such as encoding with compact bijective ladderized vectors or transformers, enable the handling of much larger trees and genomic data sets. This short perspective focuses on the application of DL in phylogenetics, introducing prevalent DL architectures. We highlight potential problems in the field by discussing the risks of using simulation-based training data and emphasize the importance of reproducibility and robustness in computational estimates. Finally, we explore promising research areas, including the combination of phylogenetics and population genetics in DL, the analysis of neighbor dependencies, and the potential to significantly reduce computational cost compared to traditional methods. This perspective illustrates the potential of DL in complementing traditional phylogeny reconstruction methods and aiding the advancement of phylogenetic analysis, especially in performing computationally demanding tasks such as model selection or estimating branch support values.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPhylogenyGenomicsHumansmachine learningneural networkphylodynamics and diversification studiesphylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID40973626
PMCPMC12514720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.