ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025
Phylogenetic Methods Meet Deep Learning.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From sites to structure to serology: a roadmap for structure-aware molecular evolution of antigenically evolving viruses.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- A deep learning-based score to evaluate multiple sequence alignments.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Ancestral state reconstruction with discrete characters using deep learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) has been widely used in various scientific fields, but its integration into phylogenetics has been slower, primarily due to the complex nature of phylogenetic data. The studies that apply DL to sequencing data often limit analyses to four-taxon trees. Many of these studies serve as "proof of principle" and perform similarly to traditional phylogeny reconstruction methods. New ways of using training data, such as encoding with compact bijective ladderized vectors or transformers, enable the handling of much larger trees and genomic data sets. This short perspective focuses on the application of DL in phylogenetics, introducing prevalent DL architectures. We highlight potential problems in the field by discussing the risks of using simulation-based training data and emphasize the importance of reproducibility and robustness in computational estimates. Finally, we explore promising research areas, including the combination of phylogenetics and population genetics in DL, the analysis of neighbor dependencies, and the potential to significantly reduce computational cost compared to traditional methods. This perspective illustrates the potential of DL in complementing traditional phylogeny reconstruction methods and aiding the advancement of phylogenetic analysis, especially in performing computationally demanding tasks such as model selection or estimating branch support values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.