Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973616›Full record

ReviewTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2026

Butterflies in the stomach: a critical analysis on human scoleciasis.

Michele Calatri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michele CalatriFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5612-9976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Butterflies and moths have been admired for their beauty since ancient times, but even these graceful insects can pose a danger to humans, albeit rarely, mainly because of the stinging toxic hairs on the larval stage of some species. In addition to this, since the 16th century, occasional findings of caterpillars still alive after being expelled by people through vomit or faeces led prominent scientists to consider the possibility that the larvae of some species of butterflies and moths, if accidentally ingested, could survive in the human gastrointestinal tract and cause a true infestation. More recently, in the 20th century, there have been reports of caterpillars of certain moths penetrating pre-existing skin wounds under particular circumstances. The human infestation (true or alleged) with caterpillars is known as scoleciasis. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of all documented cases of human scoleciasis in the literature to date and to assess whether or not this phenomenon should be considered a true parasitosis.

Indexed as

ButterfliesMothsAnimalsHumansLarvabutterflycaterpillarmothparasitic infestationpseudoparasitosisscoleciasis

Identifiers

PMID40973616
PMCPMC12805381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.