Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973478›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

ChemBounce: a computational framework for scaffold hopping in drug discovery.

Woo Dae Jang, Changdai Gu, Yumi Noh, Kwang-Seok Oh, Jae Yong Ryu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Woo Dae JangData Convergence Drug Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1649-0174
Changdai GuArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Oncocross Co. Ltd., Seoul 05836, Republic of Korea.
Yumi NohData Convergence Drug Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea.
Kwang-Seok OhData Convergence Drug Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4242-0818
Jae Yong RyuSchool of Systems Biomedical Science, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0603-1599

Funding

Korean Government RS-2023-00240248Korean Government RS-2025-02304296Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology KK2531-20National Research Foundation of Korea
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryScaffold hopping is a critical strategy in medicinal chemistry for generating novel and patentable drug candidates. Here, we present ChemBounce, a computational framework designed to facilitate scaffold hopping by generating structurally diverse scaffolds with high synthetic accessibility. Given a user-supplied molecule in SMILES format, ChemBounce identifies the core scaffolds and replaces them using a curated in-house library of over 3 million fragments derived from the ChEMBL database. The generated compounds are evaluated based on Tanimoto and electron shape similarities to ensure retention of pharmacophores and potential biological activity. By enabling systematic exploration of unexplored chemical space, ChemBounce represents a valuable tool for hit expansion and lead optimization in modern drug discovery. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code for ChemBounce is available at https://github.com/jyryu3161/chembounce. In addition, a cloud-based implementation of ChemBounce is available as a Google Colaboratory notebook.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug DiscoverySoftwareSmall Molecule LibrariesSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID40973478
PMCPMC12449259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.