ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
That's (relevant for) me: task-set-dependent brain responses to delayed visual movement feedback.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corticocerebellar Effective Connectivity During Adapting to vs. Ignoring Delayed Visual Movement Feedback.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cortical candidates for self-other distinction based on visual and action cues: where do we stand?Brain structure & function · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bodily self-other distinction relies on the detection of (mis)matches between predicted and actual sensory movement consequences, but the brain can also use these mismatches to update its body representation. Here, we manipulated the behavioural relevance of unpredicted (delayed) visual movement feedback during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants matched a target oscillation with either their real, unseen hand (RH task) or with a glove-controlled virtual hand (VH task), under varying visual feedback delays. Delays were task-relevant in the VH task (requiring visuomotor adaptation) but irrelevant in the RH task. VH > RH task execution activated the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and extrastriate visual cortex significantly more strongly. The cerebellum showed stronger overall activity and correlations with delay in the VH > RH task. Thus, the instructed behavioural relevance of delayed visual movement feedback enhanced responses of the PPC (and the cerebellum), likely for visuomotor adaptation. Activity in temporoparietal regions correlated significantly with the amount of delay-equally strongly in both tasks-suggesting a basic mechanism of visuomotor comparison. Delay changes and errors correlated with activity in the anterior insulae, more strongly so in the VH > RH task, suggesting task-set-dependent visual error processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.