ArticleBMJ open2025
Risk factors for dysphagia in elderly patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between swallowing function and clinical parameters in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Swallowing impairment and aspiration risk in clinically stabilized patients hospitalized for acute respiratory events: a cohort-wide machine-learning analysis with COPD-specific insights.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGiven the global trend toward population ageing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has emerged as an increasingly common health concern. As a chronic pulmonary disorder frequently encountered in clinical settings, COPD typically involves multiple organ-system impairments. Among these impairments, dysphagia is a significant complication in elderly patients with COPD. Dysphagia profoundly compromises the patients' quality of life and increases risks such as malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia, thereby exacerbating the overall disease burden. Although systematic reviews evaluating dysphagia prevalence in COPD populations, the quantitative synthesis of associated risk factors has been hindered by inadequate reporting in the original studies. At present, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses specifically address the risk factors associated with dysphagia among elderly patients with COPD. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify and systematically analyse these risk factors, ultimately providing reliable evidence to facilitate early identification and improve clinical management strategies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The literature will be meticulously searched through a variety of electronic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Literature Service System (CBM), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), Wan Fang Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). We will conduct a thorough investigation of the literature focusing on risk factors associated with dysphagia in elderly individuals diagnosed with COPD, spanning from the inception of each database up to October 2025. Two investigators will independently review the literature, evaluate the quality of studies and extract data based on clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria to maintain rigour and consistency. The analysis will employ Stata V.14.0 software for the purposes of data merging and assessment of potential biases. OR along with 95% CI will serve as integrated statistical metrics. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed using the I ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since this study involves an analysis of previously published literature without direct patient participation, obtaining ethical approval is not required. The outcomes of the current investigation will be disseminated through academic journals following a stringent peer-review process. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251006411.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.