ArticleBMJ open2025
Measurement of subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment using Brief Elderly Cognitive Screening Inventory in Chinese community older adults: a cross-sectional feasibility study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSubjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are high-risk factors for dementia. We developed a cognitive measurement tool for screening SCD and MCI in community-dwelling elderly individuals.
objectiveThis study investigated the feasibility of using the Brief Elderly Cognitive Screening Inventory (BECSI) as a screening measure for MCI and SCD in community elderly.
designA cross-sectional validation study.
participantsThe study included 1642 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥60 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Cronbach's α and split-half coefficients were calculated to test its reliability. The BECSI scores of the normal control group, SCD group and MCI group were compared. The internal consistency analysis, correlation analysis with the neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) and core neuropsychological test (CNT) were conducted. The screening efficacy of BECSI was verified by receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsBECSI was a self-report questionnaire. Its Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half coefficient were respectively 0.923 and 0.888. The correlation coefficients between the total score and individual items ranged from 0.185 to 0.813, and were also significantly correlated with NPI and CNT. Statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups in the total scores. The areas under the curves for distinguishing SCD from normal cognitive and MCI from SCD are 0.835 and 0.889, respectively, with the optimal cut-off points of 12.5 and 16.5.
conclusionBECSI is quick and easy to administer, and can be used as a feasible and useful measure for screening SCD and MCI in community-dwelling older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.