ArticleBMJ open2025
How do new doctors prescribe insulin? Qualitative exploration of the complexity of everyday practice and implications for medical education.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectives(1) Analyse in depth an exemplar safety-critical task required of newly qualified doctors (prescribing insulin) and (2) Provide transferable insights into how undergraduate education could better educate medical students to meet the demands of practice when they become postgraduate trainees.
designDocument analysis of doctors' reported experiences of insulin prescribing, an everyday task that has an emergent logic of practice and harms not just patients but (psychologically) new doctors. Application of third-generation (social emergence) complexity theory to explore why practice can be 'mutually unsafe'. SETTINGS: A system of care comprising all five Northern Irish (UK) Health and Social Care Trusts, which together provide healthcare to a population of nearly two million people.
participants68 postgraduate year 1 and year 2 trainees (PGY1/2s), mainly PGY1s.
main outcome measuresThick description of new doctors' contexts of action, reasons for acting and specific actions. We present this as a narrative compiling all 68 stories, 13 detailed exemplar stories and a diagram summarising how multiple factors interacted to make practice complex.
resultsSituations that required PGY1/2s to act had interacting layers of complexity: (1) disease trajectories; (2) social dynamics between stakeholders and (3) contextual influences on stakeholders' interactions. Out-of-hours working and unsuitable wards intensified troublesome contextual influences. All three individually complex layers 'crystallised' briefly to create 'moments of action'. At best, PGY1/2s responded proactively, 'stretched time' and checked the results of their actions. At worst, PGY1/2s 'played safe' in unsafe ways (eg, took no action), acted on unsafe advice or defaulted to actions protecting them from criticism. Informal, pervasive rules emerged from, and perpetuated, unsafe practice.
conclusionsNew doctors' work includes acting on indeterminate, emergent situations whose complexity defies rules that are determinate enough to be taught off the job. If new doctors are to perform capably in moments of action, medical students need ample, supervised, situated experience of what it is like to take responsibility in such moments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.