Trial reportBMJ open respiratory research2025
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled molgramostim in healthy people.
Trial report in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02468908 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Centre, Single Ascending Dose and Multiple Ascending Dose Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Molgramostim When Administered by Inhalation to Healthy Adult Subjects), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Centre, Single Ascending Dose and Multiple Ascending Dose Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Molgramostim When Administered by Inhalation to Healthy Adult Subjects
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInhaled molgramostim, a form of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), is a promising investigational pharmacotherapy for autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP); however, its pharmacology in healthy subjects has not been reported.
methodsThis randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre, phase 1 clinical trial assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled molgramostim in healthy adults in single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies: one 150, 300 or 600 µg administration or six consecutive daily 300 or 600 µg administrations with evaluations over 28 or 34 days, respectively. The primary endpoint was safety, which was evaluated based on the number and severity of treatment-emergent AEs following single and multiple inhaled doses of molgramostim.
results42 subjects were enrolled including 18 in the SAD study and 24 in the MAD study; all completed the study. Inhaled molgramostim in healthy people was well tolerated and no dose-limiting safety concerns or anti-drug antibody formation were observed in either study. GM-CSF was measurable in serum 30 min after administration of inhaled molgramostim, peaked at 2 hours for all three doses and had an elimination half-life of 1.7±0.0 to 5.9±0.9 hours in the SAD and MAD studies. Systemic GM-CSF exposure was non-linear in both the SAD and MAD studies. Inhaled molgramostim caused a rapid increase in white blood cells (WBC) counts and leucocyte subsets that normalised by 8 hours (SAD) or 15-21 days (MAD). Fractional exhaled nitric oxide remained within the normal range at all doses but was numerically, but not significantly, increased at the 600 μg dose.
conclusionsIn healthy people, inhaled molgramostim was well-tolerated and resulted in systemic exposure at picogram levels, which had the expected PD effects on blood leucocyte levels that mostly remained within normal ranges. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02468908; EudraCT No. 2013-001687-32.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.