ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Conformal inference for reliable single cell RNA-seq annotation.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationDespite the inherent complexity associated to automatic cell type assignments, most supervised learning models overlook rigorous uncertainty quantification on the annotations. Although some existing pipelines incorporate rejection options under predefined circumstances, they usually rely on arbitrary assumptions and do not provide statistical guarantees. In this work, we propose a methodology based on the conformal prediction framework to provide reliable single-cell annotations. Conformal prediction provides statistical guarantees on the outcome predictions without making any assumption about the underlying distribution of the data. Our methodological proposal leverages conformal inference to address two critical challenges in single-cell RNA sequencing annotations: (i) detect out-of-distribution cell types in the query data; and, (ii) perform reliable uncertainty quantification of the cell annotations through well-calibrated prediction sets.
resultsWe evaluated the anomaly detector and the uncertainty-aware annotator in 10 batched experiments derived from various tissues. Specifically, we studied three different annotation taxonomies (standard, classwise, and cluster) alongside three different non-conformity measures. The results showed that our anomaly detector effectively identified previously unseen cell types, producing well-calibrated prediction sets. This rigorous annotation helped maintain coverage probabilities at the expected significance level. Finally, we illustrate how the integration of conformal prediction outputs enhanced further downstream analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The automatic scRNA-seq annotator is available at https://github.com/digital-medicine-research-group-UNAV/conformalized_single_cell_annotator and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15870599.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.