ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025
Boosting the Power of Rare Variant Association Studies by Imputation Using Large-scale Sequencing Population.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multi-ancestry sequencing-based genome-wide association study of C-reactive protein in 513,273 genomes.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- Harnessing Large Cohorts and AI to Bridge Genomic Discovery and Clinical Practice.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the emergence of population-scale whole-genome sequencing (WGS), rare variants can be captured precisely. Studying rare variants explains part of the heritability of complex traits that is overlooked by conventional genome-wide association studies (GWASs). However, the extent to which imputed data can approximate or improve upon the power of WGS data in rare variant association studies remains unclear. Using the UK Biobank WGS data (n = 150,119) as the ground truth, we first evaluated the consistency of rare variants in the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array data imputed using TOPMed or HRC+UK10K reference panel. Imputation quality (average R2) of the TOPMed-imputed data reached 0.6 even for extremely rare variants with minor allele count ≤ 5. TOPMed-imputed data were closer to WGS data across three ethnic groups, with average Cramer's V > 0.75. Furthermore, association tests were performed on 45 traits. At the same sample size (n = 150,119), neither imputed dataset outperformed WGS data, but the results of the TOPMed-imputed data were more consistent with those of WGS data. When the sample size was increased to 488,377, the number of significant rare variants identified from the TOPMed-imputed data increased by 27.71% for quantitative traits and by approximately 10-fold for binary traits. Finally, we meta-analyzed the association results of SNP array and WGS for lung cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer, respectively. Compared to WGS-based results, more significant variants and genes were identified. Our findings highlight that incorporating rare variants imputed using large-scale sequencing populations can boost the power of rare variant association studies when WGS has limited sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.