Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973091›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025

Boosting the Power of Rare Variant Association Studies by Imputation Using Large-scale Sequencing Population.

Jinglan Dai 戴景岚, Yixin Zhang 张艺昕, Yuan Gao 高源, Hongru Li 李鸿儒, Sha Du 杜莎, Hao Hong 洪豪, Dongfang You 尤东方, Zaiming Li 郦再鸣, Ruyang Zhang 张汝阳, Yang Zhao 赵杨 and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jinglan Dai 戴景岚Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0009-0005-0944-9757
Yixin Zhang 张艺昕Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8280-2422
Yuan Gao 高源Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0009-0005-7523-4551
Hongru Li 李鸿儒Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0009-0005-1527-4500
Sha Du 杜莎Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0009-0005-5023-7369
Hao Hong 洪豪Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0009-0000-3114-7767
Dongfang You 尤东方Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0856-0323
Zaiming Li 郦再鸣Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0009-0007-0366-3095
Ruyang Zhang 张汝阳Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3861-4297
Yang Zhao 赵杨Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1393-7567
Zhonghua Liu 刘中华Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3048-9823
David C ChristianiDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0301-0242
Feng Chen 陈峰Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2699-7190
Sipeng Shen 沈思鹏Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0436-4736

Funding

The Boston Lung Cancer Survival CohortU01CA209414 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI David C Christiani · 2017 to 2026
$12.2M
Statistical Methods for Analysis of Massive Genetic and Genomic Data in Cancer ResearchR35CA197449 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI XIHONG LIN · 2015 to 2026
$10.9M
National Natural Science Foundation of China 82103946National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173620National Natural Science Foundation of China 82220108002National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373685NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197449NCI NIH HHS U01 CA209414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of population-scale whole-genome sequencing (WGS), rare variants can be captured precisely. Studying rare variants explains part of the heritability of complex traits that is overlooked by conventional genome-wide association studies (GWASs). However, the extent to which imputed data can approximate or improve upon the power of WGS data in rare variant association studies remains unclear. Using the UK Biobank WGS data (n = 150,119) as the ground truth, we first evaluated the consistency of rare variants in the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array data imputed using TOPMed or HRC+UK10K reference panel. Imputation quality (average R2) of the TOPMed-imputed data reached 0.6 even for extremely rare variants with minor allele count ≤ 5. TOPMed-imputed data were closer to WGS data across three ethnic groups, with average Cramer's V > 0.75. Furthermore, association tests were performed on 45 traits. At the same sample size (n = 150,119), neither imputed dataset outperformed WGS data, but the results of the TOPMed-imputed data were more consistent with those of WGS data. When the sample size was increased to 488,377, the number of significant rare variants identified from the TOPMed-imputed data increased by 27.71% for quantitative traits and by approximately 10-fold for binary traits. Finally, we meta-analyzed the association results of SNP array and WGS for lung cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer, respectively. Compared to WGS-based results, more significant variants and genes were identified. Our findings highlight that incorporating rare variants imputed using large-scale sequencing populations can boost the power of rare variant association studies when WGS has limited sample sizes.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhole Genome SequencingFemaleHumansGenome-wide association studyGenotype imputationRare variantWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40973091
PMCPMC13005946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.