ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026
A Scoping Review of Theory-Based Tobacco Control Efforts for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionUnderstanding which theories have been effectively applied in tobacco control efforts for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals will help identify constructs to incorporate into future tobacco control efforts aimed at reducing SGM tobacco disparities. This scoping review summarizes the use of theory in SGM-focused tobacco control efforts.
methodsWe searched four databases using SGM- and tobacco-focused terms in November 2023. Two trained coders independently screened each title and abstract, reviewed the full text, and extracted data about theories used and which tobacco control measures from the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control were included.
resultsThe final analytic sample included 86 papers. Of those, 11 (12.9%) discussed price/tax manipulations, 15 (17.7%) discussed secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies, 11 (12.9%) discussed product characteristics (e.g., flavors), 5 (5.9%) discussed product disclosures (e.g., warning labels), 7 (8.1%) discussed packaging, 23 (27.1%) discussed education, communication and public awareness, 15 (17.7%) discussed tobacco advertising and promotion, 49 (57.7%) discussed tobacco prevention/cessation interventions, and 1 discussed Tobacco 21 (1%). Under half (31 articles, 36.0%) explicitly presented theoretical models.
conclusionsThis review found a relative lack of theoretical models applied in tobacco control initiatives for SGM people. Of the 31 studies that did, most used theory to help clarify the etiology and associated factors of tobacco use (e.g., minority stress, increased exposure to marketing) or tailor prevention/cessation interventions focused on SGM individuals. Future studies should be grounded in theory to increase the effectiveness of these activities while preventing potential unintended consequences. IMPLICATION: This scoping review aimed to summarize which theoretical models have been implemented in relation to tobacco control measures among SGM individuals. Most theories were integrated in helping explain disparities or tailor interventions. Large-scale tobacco control initiatives may cause unique harm to SGM samples when critical theories are not integrated into their design and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.