Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973040›Full record

ReviewArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2025

Cerebellar syndromes: clinical observations leading to the recognition of the three types.

Mario Manto, Hiroshi Mitoma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mario MantoCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Unité des Ataxies Cérébelleuses, Charleroi, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6034-4380
Hiroshi MitomaTokyo Medical University, Department of Medical Education, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0513-1811

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 24K02668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar syndrome is traditionally categorized into three primary types: cerebellar motor syndrome (CMS), vestibulocerebellar syndrome (VCS), and cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) or Schmahmann syndrome (SS). The first type is subdivided into five elemental features: dysmetria, kinetic tremor, asynergia, adiadochokinesis and dyschronometria. The second is characterized by dysmetria of saccades and jerky pursuit, as well as downbeat nystagmus and gaze-evoked nystagmus. And the third type is associated with a broader spectrum of cognitive and affective symptoms, including impairments in executive function, spatial cognition, language processing and emotional regulation. In its extreme form, cerebellar mutism can also develop during childhood following cerebellar vermis surgery. Recent physiological studies have shed light on the underlying neural mechanisms of these syndromes by identifying a common link of dysfunction within the cerebellum's internal forward model. This is essential to the prediction of the outcomes of motor and cognitive actions and underlines dysmetria as the core common element. Despite the diversity in clinical presentation, cerebellar syndromes can be understood as disruptions of a unified neural mechanism, providing a new framework for better understanding of cerebellar deficits.

Indexed as

Cerebellar DiseasesHumansSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID40973040
PMCPMC12449102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.