Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973032›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2025

Phase 3 clinical trials evaluating poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition plus immunotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.

B J Rimel, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Kathleen Moore, Jacobus Pfisterer, Sileny Han, David Cibula, Anna Reyners, Andrés Redondo, Christos Papadimitriou, Ram Eitan and 10 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03522246 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

ATHENA (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study in Ovarian Cancer Patients Evaluating Rucaparib and Nivolumab as Maintenance Treatment Following Response to Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy)

TypeinterventionalSponsorpharmaand GmbHRan2018 to 2030Enrolled1,097ConditionsEpithelial Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Newly DiagnosedArmsRucaparib, Nivolumab, Placebo Oral Tablet, Placebo IV Infusion
NCT03602859 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Comparison of Platinum-based Therapy With TSR-042 and Niraparib Versus Standard of Care Platinum-based Therapy as First-line Treatment of Stage III or IV Nonmucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorTesaro, Inc.Ran2018 to 2029Enrolled1,400ConditionsOvarian Neoplasms, Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal CarcinomaArmsNiraparib, Dostarlimab (TSR-042), Standard of care, Dostarlimab-Placebo, Niraparib-Placebo
NCT03737643 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase III Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre Study of Durvalumab in Combination With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab, Followed by Maintenance Durvalumab, Bevacizumab and Olaparib in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients (DUO-O).

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2019 to 2026Enrolled1,407ConditionsAdvanced Ovarian CancerArmsBevacizumab, Durvalumab, Olaparib, Placebo olaparib, Durvalumab placebo
NCT03740165 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized Phase 3, Double-Blind Study of Chemotherapy With or Without Pembrolizumab Followed by Maintenance With Olaparib or Placebo for the First-Line Treatment of BRCA Non-mutated Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) (KEYLYNK-001 / ENGOT-ov43 / GOG-3036)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2018 to 2026Enrolled1,367ConditionsOvarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Peritoneal NeoplasmsArmsPembrolizumab, Placebo for pembrolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Olaparib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

B J RimelDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4808-3805
Eric Pujade-LauraineMedical Oncology Department, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, University of Paris, Paris 75004, France.
Kathleen MooreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.
Jacobus PfistererAGO Study Group, Wiesbaden 65185, Germany.
Sileny HanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7476-3372
David CibulaDepartment of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 116 36; and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 128 08, Czech Republic.
Anna ReynersDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands.
Andrés RedondoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ and GEICO, Madrid 28046, Spain.
Christos PapadimitriouHeCOG and Oncology Unit, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 115 28, Greece.
Ram EitanGynecologic Oncology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel.
Sandro PignataUro-Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G Pascale, Naples 80131, Italy.
Rosalind GlasspoolBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 0YN, United Kingdom.
Mansoor Raza MirzaDepartment of Cancer Treatment, Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Lubomir BodnarFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Siedlce, Siedlce 08-110, Poland.
Linda DuskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22903, United States.
Diane ProvencherDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H2X 3E4, Canada.
Rébécca PhaëtonGlobal Medical Affairs, GSK, Collegeville, PA 19426, United States.
Manjinder BainsGlobal Medical Affairs, GSK, London W4 2HD, United Kingdom.
Elif CoskuncayGlobal Medical Affairs, GSK, London W4 2HD, United Kingdom.
Anne Claire Hardy-BessardOncologie Médicale, Centre CARIO -HPCA, and Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Plérin Sur Mer, Plérin 22190, France.

Funding

GSK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer is the second deadliest gynecologic malignancy globally. The current standard of care first-line therapy for newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy (±bevacizumab), followed by maintenance therapy with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, bevacizumab, or a combination of the two. Although anti-programmed cell death (PD) protein 1 and anti-PD ligand 1 antibodies (PD-[L]1 inhibitors) have shown benefit in several solid tumors, their effect in ovarian cancer remains uncertain. Several trials are evaluating PD-(L)1 inhibitors in combination with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitor maintenance treatment. Here, we review trial designs to understand key similarities and differences for future assessments of the results. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe clinical trials registry "ClinicalTrials.gov" was searched using keywords, including ovarian cancer and niraparib, olaparib, or rucaparib. Search results were then filtered for phase 3 and manually reviewed to identify trials evaluating combinations of PARP inhibitors and PD-(L)1 inhibitors in the first-line setting.

resultsFour trials, ENGOT-OV44/FIRST (NCT03602859), ENGOT-OV46/AGO-OVAR 23/GOG-3025/DUO-O (NCT03737643), ENGOT-OV43/GOG-3036/KEYLYNK-001 (NCT03740165), and ENGOT-OV45/GOG-3020/ATHENA (NCT03522246), were identified. Of these, FIRST, DUO-O, and KEYLYNK-001 are evaluating both first-line use in combination with chemotherapy and maintenance, whereas ATHENA focuses on maintenance after a response to chemotherapy; however, DUO-O and KEYLYNK-001 do not include a PARP inhibitor in the comparator arm, limiting the ability to compare the added benefit of immunotherapy over the current standard of care.

conclusionsResults of these trials will determine whether PARP inhibitor and PD-(L)1 inhibitor combination with or without bevacizumab can improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialImmunotherapyOvarian NeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHumansPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitorsadvanced ovarian cancerfirst-lineimmunotherapymaintenancePARP inhibitionPD-(L)1 inhibition

Identifiers

PMID40973032
PMCPMC12578505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.