ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
UMI-nea: a fast, robust tool for reference-free UMI deduplication and accurate quantification.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- PD-1 and TIGIT coexpression enables selective enrichment of clonally expanded tumor-reactive CD8 T cells for melanoma TIL therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Fastq-dupaway: a fast and memory-efficient tool for deduplication of single- and paired-end NGS data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationOne of the key applications of Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) in high-throughput sequencing is to correct for PCR amplification bias and removal of PCR duplicates, thereby improving quantification in DNA-seq and RNA-seq applications. Accurately grouping error-bearing UMIs that originate from the same input molecule through a UMI deduplication method is a critical step in this process. However, many existing UMI deduplication tools rely on simple Hamming distance comparisons or suboptimal clustering algorithms, often resulting in erroneous UMI groupings, particularly in error-prone long-read sequencing or ultra-high-depth short-read sequencing.
resultsWe introduce UMI-nea, a tool that utilizes Levenshtein distance comparisons and a novel clustering approach to optimize multithreading workflows. Compared against three other indel-aware UMI deduplication tools, UMI-nea achieves more accurate UMI groupings with efficient run time. It demonstrates robust performance across diverse sequencing platforms, depths, and UMI lengths. Additionally, UMI-nea incorporates a data-guided adaptive UMI filter, further enhancing quantification accuracy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: UMI-nea is available on github https://github.com/Qiaseq-research/UMI-nea.git or Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16745758. Sequencing data are stored at https://qiagenpublic.blob.core.windows.net/umi-nea-datasets/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.