Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40972675›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2025

Implementing MyChart-Driven Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection at Three Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinics.

Megan A Mullins, Lisa Reber, Charlene Stein, Suzanne Cole, Changchuan Jiang, Timothy P Hogan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan A Mullins1Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Lisa Reber1Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Charlene Stein3Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Suzanne Cole2Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Changchuan Jiang2Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Timothy P Hogan1Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational MedicineUL1TR003163 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2021 to 2025
$39.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough systematic collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data is essential for identifying and addressing disparities-and has been associated with improved survivorship outcomes-its implementation in oncology care remains limited. Recognizing clinic time and staff barriers, we piloted a multicomponent implementation strategy centered on collecting SOGI data through an online patient portal and evaluated its feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis SOGI strategy, previously developed with input from national stakeholders, included (1) assignment of SOGI questions to all patients via MyChart, with follow-up in clinic as needed; (2) staff training for SOGI understanding, patient respect, and safety; (3) a script for asking patients about their SOGI; and (4) a clinic champion. We piloted the strategy at 3 outpatient adult cancer clinics for a total of 6 months. We conducted an evaluation that included preimplementation clinic staff surveys, patient surveys and interviews (after patients were asked about their SOGI), and postimplementation staff surveys and interviews. We evaluated SOGI collection rates for the study period using EPIC Clarity data.

resultsSOGI data were collected from 71% (n=1,410) of patients, and 94% of responses were collected on MyChart before clinic. The training helped 40% of surveyed staff (n=4) feel more comfortable asking about SOGI; however, staff interviewed (n=6) reported not attending the entire training. This likely contributed to their reported fear of patient reactions and lack of understanding that they were expected to ensure SOGI was documented for all patients. Of the 98 patient survey respondents (33% response rate), 69% reported that it was important for their provider to know their SOGI. In interviews (n=17), patients described MyChart as an acceptable and private method for collecting SOGI information.

conclusionsThe MyChart-driven strategy for SOGI data collection was efficient, effective, feasible, and acceptable for collecting this information from most patients. Future work will focus on refining and reformatting staff training to ensure respectful SPGI data collection and on capturing information from patients who did not previously respond.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesData CollectionGender IdentitySexual BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40972675
PMCPMC13398794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.