Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40972593›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026

Revisiting the social determinants of health with explainable AI: a cross-country perspective.

Jiani Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jiani YanLeverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9379-1547

Funding

Leverhulme Research Centres RC-2018-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In social science and epidemiological research, individual risk factors for mortality are often examined in isolation, while approaches that consider multiple risk factors simultaneously remain less common. Using the Health and Retirement Study in the United States, the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing in the UK, we explore the predictability of death with machine learning and explainable AI algorithms, which integrate explanation and prediction simultaneously. Specifically, we extract information from all datasets in 7 health-related domains, including demographic, socioeconomic, psychology, social connections, childhood adversity, adulthood adversity, and health behaviors. Our self-devised algorithm reveals consistent domain-level patterns across datasets, with demography and socioeconomic factors being the most significant. However, at the individual risk-factor level, notable differences emerge, emphasizing the context-specific nature of certain predictors. This article is part of a Special Collection on Cross-National Gerontology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningMortalitySocial Determinants of HealthAgedEuropeFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdomcross-national comparisonsexplainable AImachine learningpredictive precisionsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40972593
PMCPMC13017747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.