ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2025
Towards molecular evolutionary epigenomics with an expanded nucleotide code involving methylated bases.
Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In molecular evolution analyses, genomic DNA sequence information is usually represented in the form of 4 bases (ATGC). However, research since the turn of the century has revealed the importance of epigenetic genome modifications, such as DNA base methylation, which can now be decoded using advanced sequence technologies. Here we provide an integrated framework for analyzing molecular evolution of nucleotide substitution, methylation, and demethylation using an expanded nucleotide code that incorporates different types of methylated bases. As a first attempt, we analysed substitution rates between bases, both unmethylated and methylated ones. As the model methylomes, we chose those of Helicobacter pylori, a unicellular bacterium with the largest known repertoire of sequence-specific DNA methyltransferases. We found that the demethylation rates are remarkably high while the methylation rates are comparable with the substitution rates between unmethylated bases. We found that the ribosomal proteins known for sequence conservation showed high methylation and demethylation frequencies, whereas the genes for DNA methyltransferases themselves showed low methylation and demethylation frequencies compared to base substitution. This study represents the first step toward molecular evolutionary epigenomics, which, we expect, would contribute to understanding epigenome evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.