ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2026
Evaluation of occupational exposure to airborne quartz in the cutting and grinding of ceramic tiles.
Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crystalline silica was categorized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a known human carcinogen. Activities related to the processing of ceramic tiles, releasing crystalline silica, may vary considerably in terms of hours worked per day and days worked per week. This variability could be particularly high for craftsmen who process ceramic materials directly on-site during installation. The aim of this study is to measure the likely exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) during ceramic tiles installation, evaluating the exposure to RCS of workers processing these tiles. Exposure assessments to RCS were conducted via both fixed-site and personal sampling for 2 working hours. The measured concentrations were calculated as 8-h time-weighted average (TWA) exposures, assuming no further RCS exposure in the time period. The permitted exposure time, not to exceed the occupational exposure limit (OEL) value, was then calculated also considering the assigned protection factor of selected respiratory protective equipment. The results of this study, considered as a worst-case simulation, show that, during the processing of ceramic tiles releasing RCS, the worker exposure can be very high (up to 240.9 µg/m3), exceedance of several OELs, including the European OEL of 100 µg/m³. Even working for a few hours a day, the RCS 8-h TWA OEL is likely to be exceeded. Inhaled exposure concentrations can be reduced by using appropriate respiratory protection, by a factor equal to 10 or 20. The assumption of this work was that (i) the cutting/grinding times are not always necessarily equal to 2 h and that (ii) these processes are not characterized by pre-established and continuous processing times. For these reasons, it is important to carefully evaluate the duration of exposure to RCS during the various tasks/activities performed, as these may vary depending on different factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.