ArticleMilitary medicine2026
The Medical Impacts of Thermobaric Weapons: A Scoping Review.
Article in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact and Limitations of Advances in War Surgery, 1975 to Present.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThermobaric weapons (TW) are a class of explosive weapons designed to use oxygen from the surrounding environment to deliver blasts generating intense pressure and heat, penetrating structures more efficiently than conventional weapons. Despite the increasing use of TW in conflicts globally, no comprehensive evaluation of the literature on TW has been published to date. This review aims to assess current evidence on the medical Impacts of TW. MATERIALS AND
methodsA scoping review of the literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) methodology. Structured searches of databases including Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Global Index Medicus, Military and Government Collection, Global Health, SciELO, and Google Scholar as well as grey literature sources were performed to identify records that described injuries related to TW use.
resultsThe search identified 7,365 records. After title-abstract, full text screening and exclusion of duplicative data, 16 eligible reports, including 3 grey literature reports, were included in analysis. Represented regions included Eastern Europe, the Middle East, East Africa, and Southeast Asia. Of the reports, 8 were narrative reviews, 3 were case series, one was a case control, one was a modelling study, and 3 were grey literature reports. Four reports were conducted in high-resource settings in North America and Europe, although 6 were in low-resource conflict settings in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. Ten reports described disability, with only 6 reports presenting primary data, and no reports including analysis on patient physiology, hemodynamics, or psychological trauma. Six reports collected data from combatants only, one incorporated both combatant and civilian data, and the remaining did not specify population status. Non-uniform reporting across eligible reports prevented pooled analysis thus limited conclusions that could be drawn.
conclusionAll reports included in analysis highlighted the complex multidimensional injury patterns associated with TW, exceeding the severity of normal blast injury including pulmonary barotrauma, full-thickness burns, chemical inhalation injuries, and tertiary injuries resulting from confined-space detonations. Despite the significance of TW use and impact on casualties in modern conflict, this review identified a significant gap in the evidence base on the medical effects of TW. This lack of primary clinical data significantly constrains efforts to guide data-driven approaches to treatment algorithms, performance improvement, and rehabilitation needs for survivors of TW-related injuries. The establishment of a global registry on TW could address this evidence gap through documentation of the injuries caused by TW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.