Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971859›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2025

Determining the Cancer Center priorities at the Wilmot Cancer Institute: A proposed framework informed by an academic-community collaborative approach.

Francisco Cartujano-Barrera, Ana Paula Cupertino, Emily Hayes, Candice Lucas, Electra D Paskett, Erin Kobetz, Jeffrey Freeman, Karen Hermance, Nikisha Ridgeway, Charles S Kamen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Acceptability and Preliminary Impact of a Cancer-Focused Communication and Community Engagement Training Program for Investigators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francisco Cartujano-BarreraWilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8069-1750
Ana Paula CupertinoWilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Emily HayesWilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Candice LucasEquity and Advocacy Division, Urban League of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Electra D PaskettDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8247-8299
Erin KobetzDepartment of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Jeffrey FreemanCommon Ground Health, Rochester, NY, United States.
Karen HermanceThe Sally Edelman and Harry Gardner Cancer Research Foundation, Rochester, NY, United States.
Nikisha RidgewayStarbridge, Rochester, NY, United States.
Charles S KamenWilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4219-4320

Funding

University of Rochester Wilmot Cancer Institute Support GrantP30CA272302 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI JONATHAN W FRIEDBERG · 2025 to 2026
$6.4M
Actívatexto: Advancing smoking cessation and physical activity among LatinosR01MD019748 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Francisco Cartujano · 2024 to 2026
$3.8M
National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIHMD) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) P30CA272302 and R01MD019748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA272302NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD019748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant guidelines include a Community Outreach and Engagement merit descriptor related to the justification of Cancer Center priorities. Unfortunately, there is limited guidance and published literature on the process of determining the Cancer Center priorities. The purpose of this commentary is to propose a framework for Cancer Center prioritization, informed by the academic-community collaborative approach that the Wilmot Cancer Institute (Wilmot) at the University of Rochester implemented as part of a successful application for NCI designation. We first defined Wilmot's catchment area and curated data on the cancer burden in that area. We then collaborated with program leaders to assess Wilmot's capacity to address the cancer burden in its catchment area. We iteratively worked with our Community Cancer Action Council (CCAC) to determine the Cancer Center priorities. Cancer incidence, mortality, risk factors, and screening data, as well as ongoing research from Wilmot's scientific programs, were the factors that Wilmot leaders and CCAC partners considered to make this determination. Thus, (1) tobacco-related cancers (ie, bladder, esophageal, head and neck, larynx, and lung cancers; including addressing tobacco prevention and cessation, and promoting lung cancer screening), (2) hematologic malignancies (ie, leukemia and lymphoma), and (3) pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancers were determined as the Cancer Center priorities. These Cancer Center priorities have informed research and outreach at Wilmot.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesNeoplasmsHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)United Statesacademic-community collaborative approachCancer CenterCancer Center prioritiesnational cancer institute

Identifiers

PMID40971859
PMCPMC12517334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.