ArticleThe oncologist2025
Determining the Cancer Center priorities at the Wilmot Cancer Institute: A proposed framework informed by an academic-community collaborative approach.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and correlates of current smoking among deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing individuals.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Acceptability and Preliminary Impact of a Cancer-Focused Communication and Community Engagement Training Program for Investigators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant guidelines include a Community Outreach and Engagement merit descriptor related to the justification of Cancer Center priorities. Unfortunately, there is limited guidance and published literature on the process of determining the Cancer Center priorities. The purpose of this commentary is to propose a framework for Cancer Center prioritization, informed by the academic-community collaborative approach that the Wilmot Cancer Institute (Wilmot) at the University of Rochester implemented as part of a successful application for NCI designation. We first defined Wilmot's catchment area and curated data on the cancer burden in that area. We then collaborated with program leaders to assess Wilmot's capacity to address the cancer burden in its catchment area. We iteratively worked with our Community Cancer Action Council (CCAC) to determine the Cancer Center priorities. Cancer incidence, mortality, risk factors, and screening data, as well as ongoing research from Wilmot's scientific programs, were the factors that Wilmot leaders and CCAC partners considered to make this determination. Thus, (1) tobacco-related cancers (ie, bladder, esophageal, head and neck, larynx, and lung cancers; including addressing tobacco prevention and cessation, and promoting lung cancer screening), (2) hematologic malignancies (ie, leukemia and lymphoma), and (3) pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancers were determined as the Cancer Center priorities. These Cancer Center priorities have informed research and outreach at Wilmot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.