ArticlePloS one2025
End user experiences of an electronic health records platform in a tertiary hospital system in Kenya.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic Health Record (EHR) systems allow health care facilities to provide better care to patients and improve overall provider efficiency. They are vital for low-and middle-income countries in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting the well-being of all their citizens. This study aimed to evaluate perceptions and usage of a comprehensive EHR by end-users after its deployment into a tertiary hospital system and its outpatient centers in Kenya and also aimed to understand the effectiveness of various implementation strategies deployed by the institution during their implementation process.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study between October 2023 and January 2024 at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi with staff involved in using the EHR system. A standardized electronic questionnaire was shared with the users and responses were captured on REDCap after obtaining written consent electronically.
resultsOf the 548 participants who agreed to join the study, 471 responded to the survey in full. Most respondents (420, 89.9%) stated that the EHR made their work better or much better, compared to a paper-based system. Majority of end-users stated that the EHR benefited their practice (378, 87.1%), provided autonomy to healthcare workers (382, 86.2%), the quality of healthcare (424, 95.5%), interactions within the healthcare team (353, 79.1%) and enjoyment of their clinical practice (360, 80.7%).
conclusionThe majority of end users believed the EHR to be effective and appropriate to use within this specific and unique healthcare system. The specific strategies deployed by institution were also successful in ensuring high rates of EHR usage and can be looked at as a blueprint for future EHR deployments in other sub-Saharan African healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.