Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971830›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2025

Judicious use of critical care resources by predicting the need for routine ICU admission following esophagectomy.

Nikki de Mul, Lisette M Vernooij, Nynke C J van Haastregt, Eline M de Groot, Willem-Jan M Schellekens, Lennie P G Derde, Jelle P Ruurda, Olaf L Cremer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nikki de MulDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2135-2200
Lisette M VernooijDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Nynke C J van HaastregtDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Eline M de GrootDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Willem-Jan M SchellekensDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lennie P G DerdeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jelle P RuurdaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Olaf L CremerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advances made in the care for esophagectomy patients, the need for routine postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission needs reassessment. We developed a preoperative prediction model to distinguish patients requiring routine ICU admission from those who can be cared for in a post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adults undergoing elective esophagectomy between January 2011 and June 2021 in the UMC Utrecht. Firth's corrected multivariable logistic regression was used for model development and internal validation using bootstrapping was performed to obtain optimism-corrected performance metrics. Among the 619 patients included, 380 (61%) received critical care support beyond the first morning following surgery: 83 (13%) were on invasive mechanical ventilation and 338 (55%) needed cardiovascular support (with 174 [28%] receiving only low-dose norepinephrine). Predictors retained in the final model included age, diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin level, kidney function, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, tumor stadium, type of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical approach. Discrimination was acceptable (adjusted c-statistic 0.67, 95% CI 0.62-0.71) with good calibration (O:E ratio 1.00). Using the model, approximately 50% of ICU beds could be conserved, at the cost of misallocating 22% of patients to a PACU (with only 12% of PACU-allocated patients requiring mechanical ventilation). Between one- and two-thirds of elective esophagectomy patients do not need routine ICU admission, depending on whether hemodynamic support can be provided in another high-dependency unit. Our model can help rationalize perioperative patient allocation and reduce ICU bed claims by roughly half.

Indexed as

Critical CareEsophagectomyIntensive Care UnitsPatient AdmissionPostoperative CareAgedEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPostoperative ComplicationsRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective Studiescomplicationscritical care medicineepidemiologyesophagectomyintensive care

Identifiers

PMID40971830
PMCPMC12490070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.