ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Predicting response and survival of lung adenocarcinoma under anti-programmed death-1 therapy using biological deep learning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FCRLB-mediated dual control of tumor metabolism and macrophage polarization promotes lung cancer malignancy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a multimodal clinical-radiomics-deep learning nomogram based on automated chest CT segmentation for classifying COPD severity: a multicenter study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although programmed death (PD)-1 inhibitors inhibitors have been clinically approved for the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), only a few patients benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy. We developed a semi-supervised biological sparse neural network (sBiosNet) based on transfer learning to fully utilize labeled and unlabeled patient data. The pathways from the Reactome database were used to sparse the sBiosNet and extract associated biological features by integrating patients' genomic mutations and copy number variation data. We assessed the performance of the sBiosNet against random forest and support vector machine using four cohorts and provided clear interpretations using the DeepLIFT algorithm. The sBiosNet achieved the best prediction with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.888 and an area under the precision recall curve (AUPR) of 0.919 for responders versus non-responders on the validation cohort, and AUROC of 0.853 and AUPR of 0.894 on an independent external cohort. The ablation experiments demonstrated that biological sparsification and multi-omics data integration, transfer learning and semi-supervised learning all contributed to improving the sBiosNet's performance. We further confirmed that genes (such as TP53, FGF3, FGFR4, and EGFR) affected LUAD patients' response to PD-1 inhibitors by regulating pathways. Meanwhile, the Low-risk LUAD patients identified by the sBiosNet obtained significant longer overall survival and progression-free survival with anti-PD-1 therapy. In conclusion, the sBiosNet accurately predicts the response and survival of patients on anti-PD-1 therapy to reduce unnecessary treatment in non-responders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.