ReviewInflammatory bowel diseases2025
Integrating Intestinal Ultrasound to Clinical Trials in Patients With Crohn's Disease: Opportunities and Challenges.
Review in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolated perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease in contemporary clinical practice: a multicenter ECCO-CONFER cohort study.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of the international bowel ultrasound segmental activity score for assessing disease activity in Crohn's disease.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Intestinal ultrasound in primary intestinal lymphangiectasia (Waldmann's disease): a PRISMA-ScR scoping review with an illustrative adult case.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
- Practices and perceptions of imaging assessment in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide survey of physicians in Korea by the KASID Guidelines Taskforce Team.Intestinal research · 2026Article
- Intestinal Ultrasound in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Monitoring Inflammation and Treatment Response.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This narrative review summarizes the current knowledge on using intestinal ultrasonography (IUS) to evaluate disease activity in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and explores its potential role in clinical trials. Current trial endpoints and their limitations are discussed, highlighting the need for more patient-centric approaches, including increased use of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and IUS. Intestinal ultrasonography offers several advantages: it is noninvasive, requires no sedation, bowel preparation, or exposure to ionizing radiation, and enables real-time assessment of disease activity. It also demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for detecting transmural inflammation and complications such as strictures, abscesses, and fistulas. Compared with cross-sectional imaging modalities like MRE and computed tomography, IUS is more patient-friendly, cost-effective, and suitable for point-of-care examination. However, challenges remain, including the lack of a universally accepted disease activity scoring system for MRE or IUS, despite the development and validation of several scoring tools. Key unmet needs include standardization of image acquisition and reporting, adequate training of healthcare professionals, improved access to equipment, and reimbursement pathways. Intestinal ultrasonography is increasingly being integrated into clinical trials to assess transmural inflammatory changes in CD, with IUS-based measures of transmural remission or response showing promise as potential endpoints. Although its advantages are clear, addressing these unmet needs is essential to broaden the adoption of IUS in both clinical trials and routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.