Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971792›Full record

Observational studyJMIR formative research2025

Knowledge and Perceptions of AI Among Medical Students in Morocco: Cross-Sectional Study.

Imad Chakri, Otmane El Khayali, Laila Lahlou

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imad ChakriFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Agadir, University Ibn Zohr, Quartier Tilila Bp 7519 Agence Abb Agadir Al Fidia, Agadir, 80060, Morocco, 212 528227170, 212 528217171.ORCID 0009-0006-2614-5621
Otmane El KhayaliFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Agadir, University Ibn Zohr, Quartier Tilila Bp 7519 Agence Abb Agadir Al Fidia, Agadir, 80060, Morocco, 212 528227170, 212 528217171.ORCID 0009-0007-8715-334X
Laila LahlouFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Agadir, University Ibn Zohr, Quartier Tilila Bp 7519 Agence Abb Agadir Al Fidia, Agadir, 80060, Morocco, 212 528227170, 212 528217171.ORCID 0000-0001-9659-826X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming medical practice by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, streamlining workflows, and supporting clinical decision-making. However, the integration of AI into health care largely depends on the preparedness and acceptance of future physicians. Therefore, assessing their knowledge and perceptions of AI is crucial. Notably, no study has yet evaluated these factors among medical students in Morocco. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe Moroccan medical students' knowledge and perception of AI. Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted from February to May 2023 at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Agadir, Morocco. All undergraduate medical students from the first to the seventh year were eligible, excluding graduate students. A snowball sampling method was used, with a calculated minimum sample size of 385. To account for potential missing data, and given the target population size of 1150, the sample size was increased by 50%. Data were collected through a validated online questionnaire and analyzed using JAMOVI 2.6.2, with significance set at P<.05. Results: A total of 580 medical students (female n=363, 62.6%; mean age 21.3, SD 2.13 years; response rate 50.4%) participated. While 96% (n=557) had heard of AI, 73.1% (n=424) were unfamiliar with key AI terminologies, only 11% (n=64) understood AI functioning, and 14.8% (n=86) were familiar with everyday AI applications. Objectively, 88.1% (n=511) correctly identified deep learning as a method for automated pattern recognition, with 71.5% (n=415) acknowledging its interpretability challenges. First-cycle students demonstrated significantly higher familiarity with AI terms (83/156, 53.2% vs 51/156, 32.7% vs 22/156, 14.1%; P<.001). In terms of perception, 83% (n=482) viewed AI as a collaborative tool, 84.1% (n=488) anticipated a transformative impact on medicine, 39% (n=227) expected noninterventional medicine to be replaced within a decade, and 57.1% (n=331) believed certain specialties could be supplanted by AI. Regarding AI in medical education, 90% (n=522) supported its integration into the curriculum and 94% (n=546) expected enhanced learning conditions, but only 48.1% (n=279) felt ready to use AI tools upon graduation. Additionally, gender and technology familiarity significantly influenced specific perceptions, with technology-savvy students reporting greater readiness (P<.001) and women more likely to view AI as revolutionary (315/488, 64.5% vs 173/488, 35.5%; P=.02). Conclusions: Medical students' knowledge of AI is still limited, but their awareness of the potential impact of this technology on future practice and their openness to its integration into the medical curriculum constitute a promising basis for the successful implementation of these new concepts in our health care system.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMoroccoSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAIartificial intelligencecross-sectional studiesdeep learningknowledgelarge language modelsLLMmachine learningmedical educationmedical knowledgemedical studentsmedical trainingMLMorocconatural language processingNLPobservational studiesperception

Identifiers

PMID40971792
PMCPMC12456875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.