ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Clay-Mineral-Coated Separators for Lithium-Ion Batteries: Exploring the Relationships between Clay Mineral Morphology and Separator Performance.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polysulfone/MMT Clay Mixed Matrix Membranes for Efficient Diclofenac Removal and Improved Antifouling Performance in Wastewater Treatment.Membranes · 2025Article
- Clay-Mineral-Coated Separators for Lithium-Ion Batteries: Exploring the Relationships between Clay Mineral Morphology and Separator Performance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polyolefin separators comprising polyethylene and polypropylene have long been used in commercial Li-ion batteries because of their electrochemical stability, robust mechanical properties, uniform pore structure, and cost-effectiveness. However, conventional separators have limitations in withstanding harsh environmental conditions, such as elevated temperatures, owing to their poor mechanical durability. Moreover, with the development of advanced Li rechargeable batteries, these separators are required to overcome new challenges such as preventing the migration of polysulfide intermediates in Li-S batteries and inhibiting the formation of Li dendrites in Li metal batteries. Natural clay minerals have emerged as a viable solution to these issues owing to their porous structure, high mechanical strength, and abundant polysulfide-capturing Lewis acid sites. However, the manner in which the structural characteristics of minerals influence the separator performance has not been extensively assessed, thereby impeding the development of separators for future high-performance Li batteries. This review comprehensively outlines various clay minerals and their effects on the parameters and performance metrics of battery separators. Based on this review, a design guide is proposed for mineral-based separators that could potentially be integrated into next-generation Li batteries with high energy density and long-term stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.