Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971733›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Enabling near real time use of wildlife necropsy data: Text-mining approaches to derive interactive dashboard displays.

Stefan Saverimuttu, Kate McInnes, Kristin Warren, Lian Yeap, Stuart Hunter, Brett Gartrell, An Pas, James Chatterton, Bethany Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stefan SaverimuttuNew Zealand Center for Conservation Medicine, Auckland Zoo, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7626-6530
Kate McInnesDepartment of Conservation/Te Papa Atawhai, Nelson, New Zealand.
Kristin WarrenCentre for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Lian YeapCentre for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-5333
Stuart HunterInstitute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Brett GartrellInstitute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
An PasNew Zealand Center for Conservation Medicine, Auckland Zoo, Auckland, New Zealand.
James ChattertonNew Zealand Center for Conservation Medicine, Auckland Zoo, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1053-4430
Bethany JacksonCentre for Biosecurity and One Health, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual review of necropsy records through close reading and collation is a time-consuming process, leading to delays in knowledge acquisition, communication of findings, and subsequent actions. Text-mining techniques offer a means to reduce these barriers by automating the extraction of information from large volumes of free-text clinical reports, minimizing the need for manual review. Additionally, interactive dashboards enable end users to interrogate data dynamically, tailoring analyses to their specific needs and objectives. Here, we describe the principles underlying an application designed to extract and visualize information from free-text necropsy records within the Wildbase Pathology register. Reflecting the structure of a traditional necropsy review-where each record is examined in detail to identify and collate key observations-the application is divided into three sections. The first allows a user to upload a dataset in comma separated value format as downloaded from the Wildbase Pathology Register. A user can then filter and interrogate selected signalment variables of the population within this dataset. The second section uses established text-mining calculations of word correlations and Latent Dirichlet Allocation to generate visualisations to give a user a subjective sense of common themes found within the uploaded data. The third and final section uses a custom rule-based algorithm to identify and quantify positive occurrences of clinicopathologic findings as input by an end user. The foundational methods employed in this application have the potential for broader application in veterinary and medical pathology, facilitating more efficient and timely access to critical insights.

Indexed as

Animals, WildData MiningAnimalsAutopsyUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID40971733
PMCPMC12448955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.