ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Structure-guided sequence representation learning for generalizable protein function prediction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How far can you go? Extrapolating values of catalytic activity from known protein landscapes in natural and directed evolution.Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Approaches for Compound-Target Interaction Prediction: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- EnzyDiff: Sequence-based classification of mutation-induced enzyme activity direction using latent diffusion denoising.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAccurately predicting protein function from sequence remains a fundamental yet challenging goal in computational biology. Although recent advances have enabled the reliable prediction of protein 3D structures from sequences, utilizing structural information alone for functional inference has shown limited success. To address this gap, previous work has explored the integration of sequence and structural data by representing proteins as graphs, where residues are modeled as nodes, and spatial proximity defines edges. However, since the number of amino acids can vary significantly between proteins, the resulting graphs, constructed based on amino acids, also differ greatly in size. This large variation poses a challenge, as it becomes extremely difficult to extract generalizable information from graphs of such differing scales accurately. In this work, we propose Structure-guided Sequence Representation Learning, a novel framework that incorporates structural knowledge to extract informative, multiscale features directly from protein sequences. By embedding structural information into a sequence-based learning paradigm, our method captures functionally meaningful representations more effectively. Furthermore, we present a generalizable model architecture designed for multitask learning and inference, offering improved performance and flexibility over traditional task-specific approaches to protein function prediction.
resultsIn this article, we demonstrate that the proposed novel attention pooling method on protein graphs effectively integrates global structural features and local chemical properties of amino acids in various-length proteins. Through this approach, we improve performance in tasks related to predicting protein functions, functional expression sites, and their relationships with structure and sequence. By effectively extracting the information needed to predict multiple protein functions simultaneously, we improve efficiency by eliminating the need for separate learning. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code implementation is available at https://github.com/vanha9/S2RL_protein and has also been archived on zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16441001.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.