ArticleGigaScience2025
A retrieval-augmented knowledge mining method with deep thinking LLMs for biomedical research and clinical support.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A unified framework and benchmark for generalizable biomedical knowledge extraction and applications with large language models.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- A graph retrieval-augmented generation pipeline for systematic drug target discovery: validation and application to ocular neovascularization.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- SCSEQ: A web tool for analyzing single-cell RNA-seq data.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Prompt-to-Pill: Multi-Agent Drug Discovery and Clinical Simulation Pipeline.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Application of knowledge graphs in rare disease research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- An explainable graph retrieval augmented generation framework for personalized nutrition recommendation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge graphs and large language models (LLMs) are key tools for biomedical knowledge integration and reasoning, facilitating structured organization of scientific articles and discovery of complex semantic relationships. However, current methods face challenges: knowledge graph construction is limited by complex terminology, data heterogeneity, and rapid knowledge evolution, while LLMs show limitations in retrieval and reasoning, making it difficult to uncover cross-document associations and reasoning pathways.
resultsWe propose a pipeline that uses LLMs to construct a Biomedical Stratified Knowledge Graph (BioStrataKG) from large-scale articles and builds the Biomedical Cross-Document Question Answering Dataset (BioCDQA) to evaluate latent knowledge retrieval and multihop reasoning. We then introduce Integrated and Progressive Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning (IP-RAR) to enhance retrieval accuracy and knowledge reasoning. IP-RAR maximizes information recall through integrated reasoning-based retrieval and refines knowledge via progressive reasoning-based generation, using self-reflection to achieve deep thinking and precise contextual understanding. Experiments show that IP-RAR improves document retrieval F1 score by 20% and answer generation accuracy by 25% over existing methods.
conclusionsThe IP-RAR helps doctors efficiently integrate treatment evidence to inform the development of personalized medication plans and enables researchers to analyze advancements and research gaps, accelerating the hypothesis generation phase of scientific discovery and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.