Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971592›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2025

A retrieval-augmented knowledge mining method with deep thinking LLMs for biomedical research and clinical support.

Yichun Feng, Jiawei Wang, Ruikun He, Lu Zhou, Yixue Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yichun FengSchool of Advanced Interdisciplinary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049 Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0007-4511-4713
Jiawei WangDepartment of EEIS, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026 Hefei, China.ORCID 0009-0005-0575-2695
Ruikun HeBYHEALTH Institute of Nutrition & Health, 510663 Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2292-8884
Lu ZhouGuangzhou National Laboratory, 510005 Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-6538-0649
Yixue LiKey Laboratory of Systems Health Science of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310024 Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1198-7176

Funding

CAS Research Fund No. XDB38050200National Key R&D Program 2022YFF1202101National Key R&D Program 2023YFF1204701Self-supporting Program of Guangzhou National Laboratory No. SRPG22007Startup Program of Guangzhou National Laboratory No. YW-YFYJ0101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge graphs and large language models (LLMs) are key tools for biomedical knowledge integration and reasoning, facilitating structured organization of scientific articles and discovery of complex semantic relationships. However, current methods face challenges: knowledge graph construction is limited by complex terminology, data heterogeneity, and rapid knowledge evolution, while LLMs show limitations in retrieval and reasoning, making it difficult to uncover cross-document associations and reasoning pathways.

resultsWe propose a pipeline that uses LLMs to construct a Biomedical Stratified Knowledge Graph (BioStrataKG) from large-scale articles and builds the Biomedical Cross-Document Question Answering Dataset (BioCDQA) to evaluate latent knowledge retrieval and multihop reasoning. We then introduce Integrated and Progressive Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning (IP-RAR) to enhance retrieval accuracy and knowledge reasoning. IP-RAR maximizes information recall through integrated reasoning-based retrieval and refines knowledge via progressive reasoning-based generation, using self-reflection to achieve deep thinking and precise contextual understanding. Experiments show that IP-RAR improves document retrieval F1 score by 20% and answer generation accuracy by 25% over existing methods.

conclusionsThe IP-RAR helps doctors efficiently integrate treatment evidence to inform the development of personalized medication plans and enables researchers to analyze advancements and research gaps, accelerating the hypothesis generation phase of scientific discovery and decision-making.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchData MiningDeep LearningInformation Storage and RetrievalHumansdeep thinkingknowledge graphknowledge mininglarge language modelretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID40971592
PMCPMC12448786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.