ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Reflections on the Optimal Use of eDiaries for Data Collection in Vaccine Clinical Trials.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Recent years have witnessed a transformative shift in the way patient-reported outcomes are captured. The increasing adoption of digital health technologies offers exciting possibilities for more efficient, engaging, and insightful data collection electronically. Regulators recommend that the source data captured electronically should adhere to Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, and Accurate principles to ensure data quality and integrity and be compliant with regulatory requirements. Traditionally, paper diaries are used to collect safety data in clinical trials; however, electronic forms of these paper diaries represent a paramount resource that could improve data quality, reduce costs, and limit the burden on clinical staff and trial participants. Electronic diaries (eDiaries) offer significant advantages, but specific measures must be taken to ensure their optimal use. In this paper, we provide our reflections on key measures, such as programming the eDiary platform, training the trial staff and participants, and real-time monitoring of participant compliance, to leverage eDiaries for optimal data collection. By implementing the measures discussed in this paper, eDiaries can offer significant advantages for both trial participants and clinical investigators by ensuring the quality and integrity of the data collected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.