ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2026
Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery for Hypertrophic Scar Treatment: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07660120 (Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Triamcinolone Delivery With and Without 5-Fluorouracil for Hypertrophic Burn Scars), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Triamcinolone Delivery With and Without 5-Fluorouracil for Hypertrophic Burn Scars: A Triple-Blinded, Randomized Split Scar Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of hypertrophic scars using fractional CO2 laser alone in comparison with adding botulinium toxin either intalesional injection or assisted drug delivery.Lasers in medical science · 2026Trial
- Laser treatment of hypertrophic scars: the operative and peri-operative practices of burns clinicians.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Deciphering the cellular landscape of pathological scars.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractional ablative laser (FAL) is a minimally invasive method of hypertrophic scar management first introduced in 2004. Laser technologies and techniques have continued to evolve since that time and have included the addition of laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) to augment the effects of the laser on scars. Laser-assisted drug delivery is increasingly reported in the literature and standard treatment protocols, underscoring the popularity of this technique among clinicians. Given this popularity, it is important to scrutinize evidence relating to the clinical outcomes LADD may achieve for patients. This scoping review examined literature relating to LADD for the treatment of hypertrophic scars in humans, aiming to clarify what clinical outcomes are achieved with its use and examining how these outcomes were studied and measured. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched, and data about study methodology, outcome measurement tools and results were extracted. Fifty-five publications that discussed LADD for the treatment of hypertrophic scars in humans were identified. Sixteen different substances, most frequently corticosteroids, were used for LADD treatment of hypertrophic scars, most often in conjunction with a carbon dioxide FAL. Study designs, outcome measurement strategies and follow-up time-frames were highly variable, as were the patient outcomes achieved. The clinical outcomes achieved with LADD are unclear, largely due to the variability of study methodology and outcome measurement. The efficacy of this technique requires further investigation with robustly designed, large trials which have comparison groups and use validated scar outcome measurement tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.