Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971504›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2026

Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery for Hypertrophic Scar Treatment: A Scoping Review.

Maria Shilova, Karin Plummer, Robert Ware, Roy Kimble, Justin Clark, Esther Cho, Lucinda McMillan, Laura Kimble, Brandon Meikle, Lauren Kunde and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07660120 (Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Triamcinolone Delivery With and Without 5-Fluorouracil for Hypertrophic Burn Scars), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07660120 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Triamcinolone Delivery With and Without 5-Fluorouracil for Hypertrophic Burn Scars: A Triple-Blinded, Randomized Split Scar Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2026 to 2028Enrolled65ConditionsBurn, Hypertrophic Scars, Scar Improvement by Laser, CO2 Laser in ScarsArmsFractional Ablative CO₂ Laser, Triamcinolone Acetonide, Fluorouracil (5-FU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria ShilovaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6890-6587
Karin PlummerSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-6508
Robert WareSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4215, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6129-6736
Roy KimbleSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4215, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2449-7707
Justin ClarkInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina 4226, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0133-1613
Esther ChoSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4215, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-3192-0405
Lucinda McMillanSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4067, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-7772-6102
Laura KimbleSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia.
Brandon MeikleCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane 4101, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3003-3589
Lauren KundeQueensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane 4101, Australia.
Bronwyn GriffinSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6182-9125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fractional ablative laser (FAL) is a minimally invasive method of hypertrophic scar management first introduced in 2004. Laser technologies and techniques have continued to evolve since that time and have included the addition of laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) to augment the effects of the laser on scars. Laser-assisted drug delivery is increasingly reported in the literature and standard treatment protocols, underscoring the popularity of this technique among clinicians. Given this popularity, it is important to scrutinize evidence relating to the clinical outcomes LADD may achieve for patients. This scoping review examined literature relating to LADD for the treatment of hypertrophic scars in humans, aiming to clarify what clinical outcomes are achieved with its use and examining how these outcomes were studied and measured. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched, and data about study methodology, outcome measurement tools and results were extracted. Fifty-five publications that discussed LADD for the treatment of hypertrophic scars in humans were identified. Sixteen different substances, most frequently corticosteroids, were used for LADD treatment of hypertrophic scars, most often in conjunction with a carbon dioxide FAL. Study designs, outcome measurement strategies and follow-up time-frames were highly variable, as were the patient outcomes achieved. The clinical outcomes achieved with LADD are unclear, largely due to the variability of study methodology and outcome measurement. The efficacy of this technique requires further investigation with robustly designed, large trials which have comparison groups and use validated scar outcome measurement tools.

Indexed as

Cicatrix, HypertrophicDrug Delivery SystemsLaser TherapyHumansfractional ablative laserhypertrophic scarkeloidlaserlaser-assisted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID40971504
PMCPMC12770983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.