Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971482›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Comparison of central composite design and factorial arrangement to evaluate the interaction between net energy, soybean meal, and standardized ileal digestible lysine content of diets fed to pigs from 11 to 25 kilograms.

Hilario M Cordoba, Mike D Tokach, Jason C Woodworth, Katelyn N Gaffield, Robert D Goodband, Joel M DeRouchey, Jordan T Gebhardt, Henrique S Cemin, Jose A Soto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hilario M CordobaDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Mike D TokachDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Jason C WoodworthDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7268-4278
Katelyn N GaffieldDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Robert D GoodbandDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Joel M DeRoucheyDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Jordan T GebhardtDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Henrique S CeminHubbard Feeds, Mankato, MN, USA.
Jose A SotoAlltech, Nicholasville, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two studies compared a central composite design (CCD) and a factorial arrangement of treatments to evaluate the effects of dietary net energy (NE), soybean meal (SBM), and standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys on the growth performance of 11 to 25 kg pigs. Experiment 1 used 4,681 pigs (PIC 337 × 1,050; initially 13.0 kg) in a CCD with approximately 35 pigs per pen and seven blocks, each comprising 19 pens: eight factorial points, six axial points, and a central point replicated five times. Eight diets were formulated to various NE, SBM, and SID Lys concentrations then blended to create the 15 dietary treatments. Net energy ranged from 2,334 to 2,762 kcal/kg, SBM from 25.5% to 35.9%, and SID Lys from 1.08% to 1.52%. Increasing SID Lys quadratically increased (P < 0.05) ADG and G:F. Increasing SBM linearly increased (P < 0.05) ADG and G:F. Increasing NE decreased (linear, P < 0.10) ADG due to a reduction in the Lys:NE ratio as NE increased. An SBM × SID Lys interaction (P = 0.082) was observed for G:F, where SID Lys increased G:F with increasing SBM due to decreasing the Lys:CP ratio. In experiment 2, there were 4,336 pigs (PIC 337 × 1,050; initially 10.6 kg) with approximately 34 pigs per pen and eight pens per treatment arranged in a 2 × 2 × 4 factorial. Eight diets with various NE, SBM, and SID Lys levels were blended to create the 16 dietary treatments. Main effects included NE (2,425 or 2,676 kcal/kg), SBM (25.5% or 33.5% of the diet), and SID Lys (1.08%, 1.20%, 1.31%, or 1.43%). There was a tendency (P = 0.063) for three-way interaction for ADG driven by the linear increase (P < 0.001) in ADG as SID Lys increased in diets containing 2,627 kcal NE/kg and 33.5% SBM compared to diets at lower SBM and NE with a higher Lys:NE ratio. A three-way interaction (linear, P = 0.023) was observed for G:F. Increasing SBM increased G:F to a greater extent in low-energy diets than in high-energy diets. Increasing SID Lys resulted in a greater response in high-energy diets than in low-energy diets. Diets containing low SID Lys and NE but high SBM increased G:F compared with low SID Lys, NE, and SBM also contributing to the interaction. Data from experiment 1 predicted results for almost all variables from experiment 2 within ±3% of the observed values. In conclusion, a CCD can provide similar estimates of pig growth performance as a factorial arrangement. In addition, both experiments showed the impact of not maintaining Lys:NE ratios when increasing NE and the benefit in G:F when increasing SBM in the diet.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietDigestionEnergy IntakeGlycine maxLysineAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsEnergy MetabolismFemaleIleumMaleSwineLysinecentral composite designfactorial arrangementlysinenet energynursery pigssoybean meal

Identifiers

PMID40971482
PMCPMC12530880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.