Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971415›Full record

ArticleInflammatory bowel diseases2026

Metagenomic Sequencing Reveals Distinct Gut Microbiome Profiles in Therapy-Naïve de Novo Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Eva Vermeer, Femke M Prins, Iwan J Hidding, Jasmijn Z Jagt, Robert de Jonge, Marc A Benninga, Ranko Gacesa, Rinse K Weersma, Nanne K H de Boer, Tim G J de Meij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eva VermeerDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-4335-0100
Femke M PrinsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8491-2610
Iwan J HiddingDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9736-3649
Jasmijn Z JagtDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0417-7121
Robert de JongeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3454-0094
Marc A BenningaDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-9188
Ranko GacesaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2119-0539
Rinse K WeersmaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-7371
Nanne K H de BoerAmsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8357-9887
Tim G J de MeijDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7556-5896

Funding

Right on Time WO 19-25The Dutch Digestive FoundationThe Dutch Digestive Foundation (MLDS) WO 19-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMicrobiome studies reveal distinct microbial differences in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), indicating its potential role in pathophysiology and as a noninvasive diagnostic biomarker. This study aims to profile the gut microbiome in children with IBD, compared to both healthy controls (HC) and controls with gastrointestinal symptoms (CGI), and to assess the potential of microbiome profiles as noninvasive diagnostic markers for de novo treatment-naïve pediatric IBD, and as early predictive markers for therapy response.

methodsWe analyzed baseline fecal samples and clinical data from 103 therapy-naïve children with IBD, 75 CGI, and 356 age and sex matched HC. Metagenomic sequencing was performed, and prediction models assessed diagnostic potential and prediction of induction therapy response at 3 months.

resultsAlpha diversity progressively decreased from HC to CGI (P < .001) and decreased even further in IBD patients (P = .0056). Beta diversity analysis showed significant clustering differences (P < .001, R2 = 0.045). Differential abundance analysis revealed 116 species differing between HC and IBD, and 30 species between CGI and IBD. Prediction models based on microbiome features accurately distinguished IBD from HC (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.96) and from CGI (AUC = 0.71). However, these models were outperformed by clinical features, such as fecal calprotectin. Microbiome-based prediction of response to induction therapy in general showed limited accuracy (AUC = 0.63), as well as for response to nutritional induction therapy (AUC = 0.67).

conclusionsWe observed profound gut microbiome differences between de novo, therapy-naïve pediatric IBD patients and controls. While microbiome profiles hold promise for improving diagnostic precision, their predictive value for therapy response seems limited.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMetagenomicsAdolescentBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFecesFemaleHumansMaleBiomarkersCrohn’s diseasegut microbiomepediatric inflammatory bowel diseaseshotgun metagenomicsulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID40971415
PMCPMC12857426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.