Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971383›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2025

Rethinking mental healthcare: operationalising intersectionality through a community-driven social clinic model.

Anuj Kapilashrami, George Kokkinidis, Marco Checchi, INNOVATE Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anuj KapilashramiCentre for Global Health and Intersectional Equity Research, Institute of Public Health & Well-being, School of Health & Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
George KokkinidisDepartment of Management, Entrepreneurship and Digital Business, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
Marco ChecchiNewcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
*Joint first authorship.
INNOVATE Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we examine the critical need for rethinking mental healthcare through a social clinic model, informed by intersectional equity perspective. Drawing on insights from the INtersectional Network Of community and stakeholder Voices, And research to Tackle (in)Equities (INNOVATE) project, we highlight significant gaps in current mental health services, including fragmentation, stigmatisation, and lack of person-centred care. Intersectionality recognises intersecting disadvantages that shape differential mental healthcare access and outcomes. By applying an intersectionality lens, we reveal how overlapping forms of disadvantage arising from social positions such as race and ethnicity, gender, geography, and immigration status interact with social drivers like socio-economic deprivation, legal status, and exclusion to create complex barriers to accessing care. For instance, young people in remote areas, asylum seekers with housing insecurity and experiencing disability, and those in socioeconomically deprived areas carry a disproportionate burden of poor mental health in Essex, UK. Social clinics, as autonomous, self-managed centres that combine medical care with social support and community participation, constitute a promising approach to reduce the gap. We argue for a community-led process of the integration of intersectionality into community engagement processes for establishing and implementing social clinics to build sustainable, inclusive, and responsive mental health services. We propose a five-step framework for operationalising this model, centred around co-design, collective action, and participatory governance, aiming to address power asymmetries and promote equity in mental health service delivery.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesCommunity ParticipationHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityMental Health ServicesHumans

Identifiers

PMID40971383
PMCPMC12448370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.