Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971166›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Stimulant Overdose Prediction Model for Medicaid-Insured Persons.

Tuhina Srivastava, Rebecca Arden Harris, Cheryl Bettigole, Hanxi Zhang, Colleen M Brensinger, Kacie Bogar, Fengge Wang, Elizabeth D Nesoff, Warren B Bilker, Sean Hennessy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tuhina SrivastavaInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Rebecca Arden HarrisDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Cheryl BettigoleDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Hanxi ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Colleen M BrensingerCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kacie BogarDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Fengge WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Elizabeth D NesoffDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Warren B BilkerDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Sean HennessyDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

Reducing OUD treatment dropout: Development and pilot test of a peer recovery support intervention in primary careK23DA054157 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Rebecca Arden Harris · 2022 to 2026
$858k
NCIPC CDC HHS R01 CE003347NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA054157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Overdoses involving methamphetamines and cocaine have increased in recent years. Identification of individuals at highest risk could facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce overdose risk. Objective: To develop and internally validate a model that predicts hospitalization or emergency department (ED) treatment for stimulant-involved overdose among the Medicaid-insured population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective case-cohort study using Medicaid claims data from 2016 to 2019 (development) and 2020 (validation) for all Medicaid enrollees age 15 years or older with a cocaine- or other stimulant-involved overdose. A subcohort was created using a simple random sample of the full cohort of all cases. Within the full cohort, cases were identified as those having any inpatient or ED encounter for stimulant-involved overdose during the following year. A case-cohort sample was obtained for each calendar year from 2016 to 2020, each with a subcohort size of 100 000. Each individual contributed only 1 case event (for an individual with multiple overdoses, only the first eligible was selected). For each of the 4 overdose outcomes, a predictive weighted Cox model was first developed among enrollees of sampling years 2016 to 2019 (development set), and its performance was evaluated in our test set of 2020. The prediction models were first developed in November 2023, and the model fairness assessment was performed in April to May 2025. Interventions or Exposures: Individual-level candidate predictors were demographic characteristics, enrollment, health care utilization, and other clinical variables. Area-level variables included social, economic, housing, and demographic characteristics data from the American Community Survey, rural-urban classification, Social Deprivation Index, retail opioid dispensing rates, and health resources. Main Outcomes and Measures: Four types of stimulant-involved overdose associated with hospitalization or ED treatment: cocaine-involved overdose, (1) involving an opioid or (2) not involving an opioid; or methamphetamine-, ecstasy-, or other psychostimulant-involved overdose (hereafter, other stimulant), (3) involving an opioid or (4) not involving an opioid. Results: The analysis included 78 795 enrollees with cocaine- and other stimulant-involved overdose (mean [SD] age, 42.2 [13.7] years; 33 304 [42%] female and 45 491 [58%] male individuals). Weighted Cox regression prediction models showed good calibration and high discriminatory performance (Harrell C statistic): cocaine-involved overdose, with (0.923) or without (0.902) an opioid; other stimulant-involved overdose, with (0.909) or without (0.868) an opioid. For cocaine-involved overdose with opioids, previous individual opioid use disorder diagnosis or cocaine use disorder diagnosis played the largest role in overdose risk prediction. For cocaine-involved overdose without opioids, previous cocaine use disorder diagnosis and area-level income inequality and housing variables contributed most to prediction. For other stimulant-involved overdose with opioids, previous opioid use disorder diagnosis and area-level percentage of those living with a disability contributed most to prediction. For other stimulant-involved overdoses without opioids, previous stimulant-related disorder and area-level proportion of individuals receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program contributed most to prediction. Conclusions and Relevance: This case-cohort study found that readily available data can be used to identify those at high risk of hospitalization or ED visit for cocaine- or stimulant-involved overdose. These individuals would likely benefit most from evidence-based interventions and awareness of risk factors for overdose.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsDrug OverdoseMedicaidAdolescentAdultCocaineEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaine

Identifiers

PMID40971166
PMCPMC12449722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.