Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971093›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025

Paroxysmal Neurology: a Guide to Diagnosing Transient Neurologic Dysfunction in Adults and Adolescents.

Ilya Kister

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ilya KisterNYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Ilya.Kister@nyulangone.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo outline a practical and comprehensive approach to evaluating transient neurologic dysfunction (TND) in adults. RECENT

findingsTNDs are a common reason for neurologic consultation. Diagnosis relies largely on history, as neurologic examination is usually normal in the post-ictal stage. The differential of TNDs is extensive, and testing should be targeted to the more likely etiologies and ones that may portend permanent loss of neurologic function. In addition to the more common causes - transient ischemic attack (TIA), seizures, migraine auras, drug-induced adverse events, hypoglycemia, blood pressure fluctuations, hyperventilation, panic attacks, and paroxysmal vestibular disorders, there are some distinctive TND presentations and special circumstances that may point to the less common etiologies. The article outlines the key features of the common presentations and presents a comprehensive differential diagnosis that includes many rare causes of TNDs in adults and adolescents. The proposed approach relies on carefully elucidating the nature, timeline, and circumstances of the symptoms, gathering examination clues, and seeking to determine whether the event is likely due to neuro-vascular, non-vascular neurologic (paroxysmal or chronic), non-neurologic, or rare neurologic etiologies. Specific diagnoses are listed for each of these categories.

Indexed as

Nervous System DiseasesAdolescentAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansIschemic Attack, TransientMigraine auraSeizureSyncopeTransient ischemic attackTransient neurologic dysfunction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.