ArticleCurrent medical science2025
Effect of Screw Distribution on Stability and Interfragmentary Strain of Lower Tibial Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Current medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Staged screw removal in external plate fixation for distal tibial fractures: a finite element study on adaptive biomechanics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the influence of working length (determined by the screw position) on the stiffness and interfragmentary strain (IFS) of femoral locking compression plate (LCP) external fixators for lower tibial fractures under full weight-bearing conditions, with the goal of providing a reference basis for clinical applications.
methodsFinite element analysis software was used to construct a model of a lower tibial fracture with external femoral LCP fixation. The models were divided into four groups according to the different working lengths (external femoral locking plate fixation 1 [EF1], EF2, EF3, and EF4). Stress distribution clouds, fracture end displacements, stiffness and IFS were tested for each model group at different loads.
resultsCompared with those in the EF1 group, the stiffnesses in the EF2, EF3, and EF4 groups decreased by 28%, 31%, and 37%, respectively, under axial compression loading. Compared with those in the EF1 group, the stiffnesses in the EF2, EF3, and EF4 groups decreased by 19%, 33%, and 35%, respectively, under axial torsion loading. Compared with those in the EF1 group, the stiffnesses in the EF2, EF3, and EF4 groups decreased by 32%, 33%, and 35%, respectively, under a three-point bending load. The IFS of the four finite element models increased with the working length of the plate, with EF1 (76%) < EF2 (107%) < EF3 (110%) < EF4 (122%). Finite element analysis revealed that under full weight-bearing conditions, the structural stiffness of the femoral LCP external fixator decreased with increasing working length, leading to an increase in the IFS, which resulted in an IFS that exceeded the ideal range required for secondary healing.
conclusionFor unstable lower tibial fractures, screws in the femoral LCP external fixator should be placed as close to the fracture end as possible to increase stability and promote fracture healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.