ArticleCurrent medical science2025
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension from 1990 to 2021 and Projections to 2040: A Systematic Analysis of Incidence, Mortality, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years.
Article in Current medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ventricular arrhythmogenesis in pulmonary hypertension: From right ventricular remodeling to clinical implications.Physiological reports · 2026Review
- Upfront triple combination therapy with selexipag: insights from a real world cohort in Chinese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- A β-cyclodextrin/AuNPs@MWCNT/chitosan-hydrogel-based 3D stochastic sensor for simultaneous determination of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, interleukin-6, and natriuretic peptide C-type in whole blood samples.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) poses a growing global health challenge, yet comprehensive epidemiological data remain limited. This study aims to assess the burden of PAH from 1990 to 2021 and project trends to 2040, addressing critical gaps in incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) across diverse socio-demographic contexts.
methodsUsing data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study, we analyzed PAH burden across 204 countries and territories, stratified by age, sex, region, and socio-demographic index (SDI). Age-standardized rates (per 100,000 populations) for incidence (ASIR), mortality (ASMR), and DALYs (ASDR) were calculated. Future trends were projected via a Bayesian age-period-cohort (BAPC) model.
resultsIn 2021, there were 43,251 (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 34,705, 52,441) global incident PAH cases (age standardized incidence rate [ASIR]: 0.52). From 1990 to 2021, PAH incidence rose by 85.62%, with the steepest increase in high-middle SDI regions (average annual percentage change [AAPC]: + 0.19%). Despite a 48.36% rise in deaths, the age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) declined annually by 0.84%, reflecting improved management. Central Europe had the highest ASMR (1.06 per 100,000), while low SDI regions showed reduced ASIR (-0.31% AAPC), likely due to underdiagnosis. PAH caused 642,104 DALYs globally in 2021, with infants (< 1 year) bearing the highest DALY rate. Projections indicate 75,000 annual cases by 2040, emphasizing an escalating burden.
conclusionPAH burden is increasing disproportionately in aging populations and high-middle SDI regions, while low SDI areas face underdiagnosis and healthcare disparities. Targeted interventions, equitable resource allocation, and enhanced diagnostic capacity are urgently needed to mitigate future PAH-related morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40971086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.