Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40971014›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

Inpatient urology consultations: intervention rates, determinant factors, and findings related to the refugee population.

Umit Uysal, Ergun Alma, Adem Altunkol, Hakan Anıl, Mert Hamza Özbilen, Serkan Tugrul, Cafer Akcor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Umit UysalDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, 01000, Turkey. uysldr.74@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-4260
Ergun AlmaDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, 01000, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2633-5274
Adem AltunkolDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, 01000, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-3694
Hakan AnılDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, 01000, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6333-0213
Mert Hamza ÖzbilenDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, 01000, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5733-6790
Serkan TugrulDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, 01000, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6878-5468
Cafer AkcorDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, 01000, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0269-1518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency of intervention requirements in inpatient urology consultations and the clinical and demographic factors influencing these decisions. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed urology consultations over a one-year period at a large tertiary regional hospital. The timing and location of consultations, indications, procedures performed, and the need for intervention were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of intervention.

resultsA total of 1,977 consultations were identified. The most common reasons for consultation were hematuria (18.9%), male lower urinary tract symptoms (18.3%), and obstructive uropathy (14.3%). The majority of consultations originated from the emergency department (59.5%). Urologic interventions were performed in 52.5% of the patients, with the most frequent procedures being urethral catheterization (18.2%), bladder irrigation (7.9%), and suprapubic catheterization (3%). According to the univariate analysis, refugee patients had a significantly higher intervention rate (p = 0.046). In the multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with the need for intervention included consultations initiated from the emergency department, the level of seniority of the evaluating physician, and symptom-based consultation requests (p < 0.001).

conclusionInpatient urology consultations constitute a significant clinical workload, and a considerable proportion of those requiring intervention involve simple procedures that can be performed by nonurologist healthcare personnel. The high rate of noninterventional consultations reduces service efficiency. Improving triage systems and providing targeted training to healthcare staff may help alleviate this burden.

Indexed as

InpatientsReferral and ConsultationRefugeesUrologic DiseasesUrologyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultConsultation efficiencyInpatientUrologyUrology consultationsWorkload

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.