ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025
Enhancing ATMO-Street model accuracy through emission source analysis using a dense sensor network: a Warsaw case study.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban air quality models are essential for managing particulate matter (PM) pollution, yet their accuracy is often limited by sparse monitoring networks and outdated emission inventories. This study presents a scalable framework for improving PM10 and PM2.5 modelling through the use of high-resolution emissions inventories and enhanced validation based on calibrated low-cost sensor networks. Using Warsaw city in Poland as a representative case study, we demonstrate that incorporating high-resolution residential heating emissions from the Central Register of Emissions from Buildings (CEEB) and calibrating road dust resuspension parameters led to concentration reductions of up to 20% in urban hotspots and reduced the prediction bias for PM2.5 by 57% at key locations. Notably, the Revised scenario resolved substantial overestimations in districts where incorrect fuel classifications had previously caused overestimations. However, persistent winter overestimations and the inability to fully capture extreme PM10 peaks in dry months highlight ongoing challenges, particularly in modelling resuspension dynamics under dry conditions. Our findings reveal that low-cost sensors, when rigorously calibrated, can extend spatial coverage and improve model validation, though they may underestimate extreme pollution events. The methodological advances presented here are broadly applicable to cities worldwide, particularly those facing similar challenges of diverse emission sources and limited regulatory monitoring. This integrated approach supports more accurate forecasting and targeted mitigation strategies, offering a scalable solution for urban environments seeking to achieve international air quality standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.