ReviewArchives of toxicology2026
Genotoxic carcinogenicity of pyrrolizidine alkaloids: relevance of potency factors for the risk assessment.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyrrolizidine alkaloids represent a large group of substances synthesized as secondary plant metabolites. The subgroup of the 1,2-unsaturated pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) can induce acute and chronic liver toxicity in humans and livestock, and many of them are considered to be genotoxic and carcinogenic. Currently, the risk assessment is based on carcinogenicity data for the relatively potent PA riddelliine, and on the assumption that all PAs, regardless of their chemical structure, have the same potency. However, results from in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that the severity of the effects depends on the alkaloids' structure and, thus, varies for different congeners. To align the concept of potency factors with risk assessment, we analysed the available studies and selected those that best reflect the human situation or mode of action, and that included riddelliine in their study design. Based on the selected studies, we used riddelliine as a reference point to calculate the relative potencies of the PAs also used in the corresponding study. Further, we propose conservatively derived relative potency factors for certain PA congeners and evaluated the impact when applying them to real food samples considering tea and food supplements as examples. Our evaluation demonstrates that the inclusion of relative potency factors for PAs has generally only a minor influence on the final risk assessment, especially when conservative factors are used. However, this approach may be of great importance in certain situations where the PA spectrum consists mainly of PAs with low potency, such as the monoester lycopsamine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.