ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Role of resolve DWI and DCE MRI in differentiating benign and malignant skull base lesions.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A study on screening of postoperative chemotherapy beneficial populations in stage II colorectal cancer based on diffusion weighted imaging andJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the utility of RESOLVE Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI in differentiating benign and malignant skull base lesions using qualitative and quantitative imaging parameters.
methodsThis prospective study included 44 patients with 45 skull base lesions who underwent MRI with RESOLVE DWI and DCE-MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and lesion-to-medulla ADC ratios were calculated from DWI. Perfusion parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve) and time-intensity curve (TIC) were derived from DCE-MRI. Benign and malignant lesions were statistically compared, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic capability.
resultsMalignant lesions had significantly lower mean ADC values (0.88 × 10⁻³ mm²/s) than benign lesions (1.05 × 10⁻³ mm²/s, p = 0.033). The lesion-to-medulla ADC ratio was also significantly lower in malignant lesions (1.03 vs. 1.25, p = 0.029), yielding 89% sensitivity and 44% specificity at a cutoff ≤ 1.167 (AUC = 0.695). Among DCE-MRI parameters, both Kep and the distribution of time-intensity curve (TIC) showed significant differences between benign and malignant lesions (p = 0.037 and p < 0.001, respectively). Kep was higher in malignant lesions (0.98 vs. 0.78), with an AUC of 0.689, 94% sensitivity, and 52% specificity at a cutoff of ≥ 0.581. Ktrans and Ve did not show significant statistical difference.
conclusionRESOLVE DWI and DCE-MRI are effective non-invasive tools for differentiating benign and malignant skull base lesions. The ADC ratio and Kep are valuable quantitative markers, while TIC pattern analysis offers complementary qualitative insights, enhancing diagnostic confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40970957What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.