Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40970955›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of membrane biology2025

Celebrating 50 Years of Single-Channel Recording with the Patch Clamp.

Luigi Catacuzzeno, Fabio Franciolini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of membrane biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Hysteretic Conductance in Ion Channel Gating.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luigi CatacuzzenoDipartimento di Chimica, Biologia e Biotecnologie, Universita' di Perugia, Perugia, Italy. luigi.catacuzzeno@unipg.it.
Fabio FrancioliniDipartimento di Chimica, Biologia e Biotecnologie, Universita' di Perugia, Perugia, Italy. fabio.franciolini@unipg.it.

Funding

MUR PRIN 20223XZ5ER
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fifty years ago, Erwin Neher and Bert Sakmann published a Nature paper on their recording of discrete, step-like currents of a few picoamps passing through individual acetylcholine receptor channels of frog muscle fibers. This observation, the first on native channels, immediately ended the decade-long dispute about the presence of ion channels on cell membranes by convincing even the most reluctant scientists that this was indeed the case. More importantly, however, the ability to record single-channel currents revolutionized the study of ion channels because it enabled scientists to observe their behavior individually in real time. We could observe them change conformation, jumping from the closed state to the open state and back again. This level of detail provided an unprecedented understanding of the gating mechanisms, conductance, and kinetic properties of channels. This retrospective illustrates the scientific context in which all of this occurred as well as its immediate and current impact on the investigation of ion channels.

Indexed as

Ion ChannelsPatch-Clamp TechniquesAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsChannel kineticsIon channelsMarkov modelsPatch clampSingle-channel recording

Identifiers

PMID40970955
PMCPMC12602605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.